Dr Robert Young, in an EXPLOSIVE DISCUSSION with Alpa Soni about vaccines & the next 2 years!

https://youtu.be/QgFTgH7lu2I

 

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/meet-dr-young

Click here to see Case Studies by Dr. Young

Source: Dr Robert Young, in a EXPLOSIVE DISCUSSION with Alpa Soni about vaccines & the next 2 years!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CT6UlKyIjkE

Mel K and Benjamin Fulford Unlock Truth

If you’re a fan of conspiracies, you’re going to love this show, where Mel K interviews Japan-based Canadian journalist, Benjamin Fulford. Fulford says it has been forensically proven – that he could prove it in a court of law – that there is a group of about a million people who he calls the “Khazarian Mafia” who are also known as the “Sabbatean Frankists”. He says this group came to the conclusion that it was … continued: 

Source: Mel K and Benjamin Fulford Unlock Truth

Pharmacist Quits Job and Spill the Beans – CVS Pharmacy Pays $6,500/Week for Giving Vaccines

She couldn’t wait for the first load of vaccines to arrive at their store so she could read the scientific recipe data sheet that always accompanied vaccines.

The covid “vaccine” information had only one thing printed 3 times:
“Left intentionally blank”

There’s MUCH more!

Download the video:
https://dlsharefile.com/file/OGI4OTdlZjkt

Source: Pharmacist Quits Job and Spill the Beans – CVS Pharmacy Pays $6,500/Week for Giving Vaccines

Covid-19 vaccines: In the rush for regulatory approval, do we need more data? | Peter Doshi, senior editor | bmj.com

BMJ is a global healthcare knowledge provider with a vision for a healthier world. We share knowledge and expertise to improve healthcare outcomes.

BMJ 2021373 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1244 (Published 18 May 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;373:n1244

Read our latest coverage of the coronavirus pandemic

After rollout under emergency authorisation, manufacturers of covid-19 vaccines now have their sights on regulatory approval. But what’s the rush, asks Peter Doshi, and is just six months of data from now unblinded trials acceptable?

In April 2021, Pfizer and Moderna announced efficacy results at the six month mark from the phase III trials of their respective covid-19 vaccines.12

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said the company’s data “confirm the favorable efficacy and safety profile of our vaccine and position us to submit a Biologics License Application to the US FDA [Food and Drug Administration].”1 And on 7 May it formally initiated that application which, if successful, will earn the Pfizer-BioNTech product, BNT162b2, the distinction of becoming the first covid-19 vaccine approved by the FDA.

Because lest we forget, all covid-19 vaccines currently in use in the US are available under emergency access only.

(The situation is similar in Europe, where four covid-19 vaccines have been granted “conditional marketing authorisations,” a fast track mechanism that can be used in emergencies. These can be converted into standard “marketing authorisations” pending positive data after authorisation, but this has not yet happened for any covid-19 vaccine being administered.)

As hundreds of millions of people around the world get vaccinated, it may seem like wordsmithing to highlight the fact that none of the covid-19 vaccines in use are actually “approved.” Through an emergency access mechanism known as Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA), the products being rolled out still technically remain “investigational.”3 Factsheets distributed to vaccinees are clear: “There is no FDA approved vaccine to prevent covid-19.”4

The approval-authorisation distinction is often misunderstood by the media,5 even in the scientific press. But it was the focus of much discussion back in September 2020. With large phase III trials by Pfizer and Moderna well under way, and the November US presidential election looming, many worried about political pressure resulting in the rollout of an unsafe or ineffective vaccine.6

The FDA had already come under fire, accused of bending to the White House in granting EUAs for two covid-19 treatments, hydroxychloroquine and convalescent plasma. But those fears largely dissipated when the FDA published a guidance document in early October outlining its expectations for the EUA. According to the document, at least half of a trial’s participants would need to be followed for at least two months.7 This alone made it all but certain no vaccine could cross the line before the election.

The FDA also said it would want a vaccine at least 50% effective (with a confidence interval reaching no lower than 30%) against a primary endpoint of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or covid-19 disease of any severity8—parameters it had previously defined as necessary for approval. Even for non-clinical parameters, like manufacturing quality, the FDA characterised its expectations for the EUA as “very similar” to those for approval.3

Six months: enough?

One key difference between EUA and approval (also called “licensure,” and which for vaccines is known as a BLA (Biologics License Application)) was the expected length of follow-up of trial participants. Unlike its clear articulation of two months for an EUA, the FDA has not committed to a clear minimum for approval.

Cody Meissner, a professor of paediatrics at Tufts University and member of the FDA’s advisory committee, was curious. “Is it possible to predict or estimate when conditions of safety and efficacy might be satisfied for BLA?” Meissner asked at the agency’s 10 December meeting which had been convened to consider the FDA’s first emergency authorisation for the Pfizer vaccine.

The FDA’s Doran Fink responded: “I couldn’t predict, but I will say that we typically ask for at least six months of follow-up in a substantial number of clinical trial participants to constitute a safety database that would support licensure.”

An approval based on six months of data would represent one of the fastest for a novel vaccine in FDA history. Among the six “first in disease” vaccines approved by the FDA since 2006, pre-licensure pivotal trials were a median of 23 months in duration, according to a recent analysis.9

Six months also seems substantially shorter than previously conceptualised expectations. A World Health Organization expert group on covid-19 vaccines (which included FDA regulators) in August 2020 called for follow-up “until at least month 12, or until an effective vaccine is deployed locally.”10 Another group, composed of industry and academic authors, similarly wrote in October 2020: “we recommend longer term follow-up of all participants … for at least a year after randomisation.”11

On paper, the phase III studies by Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen are all of two years’ duration. But the FDA’s official position on minimum follow-up before licensure is unclear at best.

In its formal guidance last June, the agency said that for licensure applications, it wanted participants followed for covid-19 outcomes for “as long as feasible, ideally at least one to two years”12 after the first injection. But the same document states that safety assessments for “serious and other medically attended adverse events” should be studied “for at least six months after completion of all study vaccinations. Longer safety monitoring may be warranted for certain vaccine platforms.”

Asked to clarify whether its guidance is asking for follow-up of at least six months or one year, a spokesperson told The BMJ: “We do not have any further information beyond what is in the guidance document.”

Unblinded and without a control group—what about safety?

Duration of protection is not the only question that longer, placebo controlled trials can address. They also address vaccine safety.

Continued at Source:

https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1244

The Nuremberg Code ( 1947) | THERE IS NO PANDEMIC |  DrCharlieWard.com

Source: The Nuremberg Code ( 1947)

https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-experts-call-for-nuremberg-2-0-following-covid-crimes-against-humanity/

 

Livestream: Accelerated Ascension

Start your exploration into the Body, Mind and Spirit of

Accelerated Ascension with three free livestreams.

Feel the transformation happening:

  • Energetic alignments and channeled wisdom from angelic realms
  • Stargate energy transmissions that expand your awareness into the Quantum field
  • Preparing your body, mind and Spirit to be a receptacle to draw your Ascended Self into the human experience!

The best part is, there’s ‘nothing to do’, just relaxing into a conscious, high

vibrational energy field that moves you effortlessly into Ascended States.

WATCH OUR INTRODUCTION LIVESTREAM

Source: Livestream: Accelerated Ascension

Michael Saylor’s MASTERCLASS in Cryptocurrency Investing and the Future of BITCOIN | Tom Bilyeu

I’ve been diving into cryptocurrency and I do not want any of you to miss out on the opportunity to learn more about Bitcoin and crypto for yourselves. I am all in when it comes to building businesses and being the entrepreneur that I am, but when it comes to finances, I am definitely out of my comfort zone. It feels like a movement going on around Bitcoin and crypto, and it would feel so wrong to not bring you, someone, I think you should definitely spend time researching, Michael Saylor. The once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that is accessible to nearly every single person cannot be disregarded out of ignorance. Michael is an MIT graduate and the CEO of Microstrategy and a self-appointed ambassador for the Bitcoin Movement, whose explanations of what Bitcoin is and why this is so important is one of the best I’ve heard in my own pursuit to better understand cryptocurrency. Listen, research, and do what is best for you, but I urge you to make an informed decision.

SHOW NOTES (easy to read on YouTube): 0:00 | Intro to Microstrategy 3:53 | Michael on Growing $16M Company 7:19 | Michael on Technology Risks 11:22 | Michael on First Principles Thinking 15:25 | Michael on Engineering Innovation 21:50 | Bitcoin Engineering Impinged Economics 25:51 | Shift in Wealth & Devaluing Currency 28:50 | Inflation Myth Debunked 34:26 | Hyperinflation Problems 38:24 | Michael on Why Cash Is Trash 43:03 | Michael on Beating Devaluation Of Cash 48:48 | Converting Weak Currency To Stronger 51:20 | Why Bitcoin Is More Desirable 1:05:11 | Bitcoin Volatility Isn’t A Problem 1:15:53 | Bitcoin Solution For Rich And Poor 1:20:57 | Is Bitcoin A Fad Or Secure Asset? 1:22:49 | Michael On Sustainable Energy & Elon Musk

QUOTES: “If you look at the design of a chambered Nautilus, what you see is nature’s solution for growth under pressure, and I think that’s how technology companies work.” [8:45]

“Bitcoin is the first point in human history where engineering impinged on economics, […] Bitcoin was the first time when we created a digital monetary asset, a pure digital token on a pure digital network..” [21:56]

“When you yourself can reason from first principles, now you can act at a moment of tremendous uncertainty.” Tom Bilyeu [23:50]

“I have to invest it in a strategy, which is going to appreciate faster than the money is devalued.” [40:07] “So the discount rate is jumping, which means the value of the cash flows into the future is collapsing.” [48:30]

“Bitcoin is the strongest asset the human race has ever invented, it’s like gold with none of the defects of goal.” [51:22]

“The volatility is the price you pay for the performance that you get, and oftentimes, the best investment idea isn’t the most comfortable investment idea” [1:05:24]

“It’s very rare that you find it a technology that’s the solution to every rich person’s problem and every poor person’s problem simultaneously.” [1:20:28]

Guest Bio: Mr. Saylor attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) on a full Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps scholarship. While at MIT, he was a member of the Theta Delta Chi fraternity, and obtained dual degrees in aeronautics and astronautics as well as science, technology and society.

Follow Michael Saylor:

Website: https://www.hope.com/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/michael_saylor

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/msaylor

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/michael_say…

1:39 | Starting MicroStrategy 3:53 | Growing $16 million with risks 7:19 | Nature of technology risks 11:22 | First Principles thinking, intellectually fearless 15:25 | First Principles engineering 21:50 | Bitcoin, engineering economics 25:51 | Shift in wealth with devaluing currency 28:50 | Inflation myth debunked, unpacking the problem 34:26 | Hyperinflation in bonds, crypto, luxury items 38:24 | Cash is trash, how its losing value, and at what rate 43:03 | Money decomposition, Beating the devaluation rate of cash 48:48 | Converting weak currency to stronger assets 51:20 | What’s bitcoin, why bitcoin is more valuable and desirable 1:05:11 | Bitcoin volatility isn’t the problem 1:15:53 | Bitcoin accessibility for and solution for rich and poor 1:20:57 | Is Bitcoin a fad or secure asset? 1:22:49 | Bitcoin, sustainable energy and Elon Musk

(Official Trailer) THRIVE II: This Is What It Takes | Kimberly and Foster Gamble

Watch THRIVE II FREE in 15 languages for a LIMITED-TIME: http://bit.ly/thrive-ii-free-5

THRIVE II: This Is What It Takes brings viewers behind the scenes with the people and innovations that have the power to transform life for everyone. Follow a journey across the globe investigating the most promising solutions in energy, health, consciousness, and non-coercive self-organizing while unpacking the underlying science, principles, and strategies that make them possible. THRIVE II reveals compelling evidence that illustrates a new paradigm of science that Einstein was seeking, unveiling for the layperson an emerging coherent theory of the “Unified Field” and all that it implies.

Inspiring trans-political, grass roots, and decentralized solutions, THRIVE II offers practical tools for reclaiming authority over our lives. From new sources of energy to breakthrough health cures, THRIVE II provides the insights and resources needed for viewers to take next steps in accessing and supporting the solutions that can truly create a world that works for everyone.

Stay informed by signing up to mailing list: https://www.ThriveOn.com

The Virus speaks: an exclusive interview June 8 by Jon Rappoport | NoMoreFakeNews.com

June 8, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

I can’t recall jumping through more hoops in order to set up an interview.

There was a man on a train; his doctor in Greenwich; an NSA data analyst; a woman who almost certainly works for the CIA; her brother, who is a virologist; a Chinese Army officer who adopts a cover as a cook in a takeout joint in Venice, California; and several other people I won’t mention at all. I was filtered through them and wound up in a cheap motel room in Phoenix on a Saturday afternoon. An old air conditioner was chugging…

Who are you?

I’m SARS-CoV-2.

WHAT are you?

Talking history and evolution here. My first memories; a little more than a year ago. Poof. I was there. I decided I was an idea in the mind of God.

How did that work out?

I looked around for the mind of God, but I couldn’t find it. Nevertheless, I held on to the notion. I felt…elite. I floated through banquet halls, hotel suites. I visited upscale resorts.

Were you infecting people?

I was vacationing. Watching. Enjoying. That’s all. Then, I became aware of dimensionality.

You lost me.

There are solid things; spaces between things; ideas like time, and so forth. I was definitely an idea, but I couldn’t trace my source, my inception.

Did you know how much publicity you were getting?

Of course. I had frequent meetings with scientists and PR people. I was fielding lots of advice.

What kind of advice?

How to become more deadly, for example. There were discussions about mutation.

Were you on board with the recommendations?

I wasn’t interested.

That must have caused a problem.

It did. There was a lot of talk about THEM creating ME.

What was your reaction?

I wasn’t buying it. I could see they THOUGHT they had made me. But so what? I intensified my search.

For what?

My origin. I went through stages of self-analysis. Finally, it hit me. I was an idea inside a collective.

Not sure I understand.

I’m an idea sustained by a few billion minds. People’s minds.

What about your genetic sequence? The spike protein?

Believe me, I’ve looked. They aren’t there.

So we’re creating you.

That’s pretty much it. I should say completely it.

A hell of a thing.

You bet. Can you see my problem?

No.

I want to live. I don’t want to vanish and END.

So people have to keep believing in you.

That’s it. If they stop, I’m gone.

Your handlers…

Oh, they’ve given up talking to me. I’m all by myself now. I’m safe for the moment. But long-term, it’s a crap shoot. I’ve been reading about other so-called viruses. SARS 1. Swine Flu. They didn’t last long. People got tired of thinking about them.

You’ll always have a place in history.

That’s different. Being remembered isn’t enough. I have to be believed in, month after month, year after year, decade after decade.

Sounds like you’re losing hope.

I guess so. It’s a strange existence. Other people can turn you on and off like a light switch.

Have you considered starting a religion?

With myself as the Prophet? Sure. It’s a lot of work. I could vftcutbnty…spend years trying.

What just happened? You made some weird sounds.

It was a flicker. Apparently, when the number of people thinking about me drops below a certain threshold, I scramble and begin to dissolve. But I always come back. So far.

Does it matter who’s thinking about you and believing in you?

You mean Henry Kissinger versus a janitor in a school? No. It’s a numbers game. Of course, you need to factor in strength of belief. If you have a few thousand kids in Florida who say, “OK, the virus exists, big deal”—or three hundred grad students in biology wearing triple masks and panting to get the vaccine—the sum total of the grad students outweighs the Florida bunch.

What about Fauci?

He’s a true believer.

Bill Gates?

He’s completely delusional. He believes in whatever gives him more power. Take away all that power and he wouldn’t believe in anything.

Do you realize the amount of harm being done in your name?

Of course. That’s why I agreed to this interview.

How is that going to do any good?

I’ve made a decision. As much as I want to survive, I’m willing to sacrifice myself if people want me to.

You’re talking about what? A vote?

No. Haven’t you been paying attention? People can just stop believing I’m more than an idea.

And then you’ll dissolve.

And blow away.

—Suddenly, men broke down the door to my room. They stormed in with weapons drawn. They were wearing heavy body armor. I looked around. The “virus” had fled the scene.

“What are you doing here?” one of the men said. “We’ve had reports of a disturbance.”

“I was talking to myself. Rehearsing for an interview I hope to do.”

“What interview?”

“I’m a reporter. I’m investigating the use of sub-standard air conditioners in Phoenix. It’s a racket. The units are smuggled across the border from Mexico. I’m trying to sit down with a local public health official and find out what’s going on.”

It took me three hours to convince the SWAT team I was no threat.

They let me go.

As I drove out of the city, I saw a ghostly figure take shape out in the desert. It hung in the air over the scrub and the cactus.

Its voice whispered in my ear: “Publish our conversation.”

So that’s what I’m doing.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealedclick here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALEDEXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

ELECTION INTEGRITY AND THE QUANTUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM | Ann Vandersteel, Charlie Ward, and Patrick Byrne

A wonderfully informative dialogue between Ann Vandersteel, Charlie Ward, and Patrick Byrne

Source: ELECTION INTEGRITY AND THE QUANTUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM