In this video Luke Rudkowski talks to Dr. Vandana Shiva about the current situation in India and how GMO’s have affected farmers there. Dr. Shiva is an Indian environmental activist and anti-globalization author to find out more about her check out http://www.navdanya.org/
… As Bloomberg’s Richard Breslow noted this morning,U.S. midterm elections yday turned out pretty much like the polls suggested; I was a little surprised to see how many stories led with economy and how many exit polls said that — it may have been the economy, but it’s not that it’s doing particularly poorly. If anything, the numbers are doing ok, it’s that people felt the distribution of the “ok” had got the balance out of whack, that neither party was listening to Main Street, aka, the citizenry.
Democrats had the bad misfortune of being the Ins, and the Ins got thrown out. This really was a wakeup call for the establishment writ large, not particularly a poke at the Democrats other than more is expected from them.
Having said that, elections have consequences, so we’re in for an interesting period; I did read one portfolio manager in Europe saying this would be good for the economy, decision making would pick up. I don’t see it – I think you just have an electorate that felt deserted by the people they thought would protect them, and Washington became synonymous with Wall St. Helps explain a lot of more populous frustrations globally.
While we enjoy the humor that someone will dare to touch the goose that lays the golden market, we wish to make a small correction: it’s not two words. It’s three: “get to work.” Because after a few days, when the excitement and the drama wears off, the people will once again realize they have been fooled, the only winners are Wall Street, the wealthy and their political marionettes in D.C. As for everyone else, well there is 2016, and then 2018, and so on… because the lie must go on.
“When you give [Democrats and Republicans] your vote, you’re telling them ‘Go ahead, keep on doing what you’re doing,'” explains Libertarian National Committee Vice Chair Arvin Vohra. “And when you vote for the Libertarian candidate you are telling them, in no uncertain terms, ‘You do not have either my approval or my permission to grow or sustain big government: shrink it now.'”As the midterm elections approach, Democrats and Republicans are making their final pleas to win over undecided voters, with some casting Libertarian candidates as “spoilers” in a few key races. But Vorha, himself running as a Libertarian for Maryland’s 4th congressional district against Democratic incumbent Donna Edwards, dismisses the charge. Despite his low poll numbers, Vohra sees the act of casting a vote for the Libertarian Party as a pathway to reform. He quotes a former Libertarian candidate: “Not all politicians are smart, but they can all count.” Vohra recently sat down with Reason TV’s Nick Gillespie to discuss the 2014 elections, the issues that resonate across the country, and why he believes voting for the Libertarian Party is not throwing your vote away.
Watch the video for a deep dive into the politics of California’s prison overcrowding problem, featuring interviews with state prison officials, local sheriffs, and former inmates.
“A prison that deprives prisoners of basic sustenance, including adequate medical care, is incompatible with the concept of human dignity and has no place in civilized society,” wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy for the majority in a Supreme Court ruling against Governor Jerry Brown and the state of California in the 2011 case Brown v. Plata.
The Supreme Court had just affirmed what lower courts had been telling California for decades: Your prisons are too crowded. It’s time to fix the problem.
Three years later, after several extensions asked for and granted, California’s government has managed to reduce the prison population, but not by enough to meet the 137.5 percent of occupational capacity target set by the courts. But they are close enough, at 140 percent, to give Gov. Brown the confidence to declare victory.
“The prison emergency is over in California,” Brown said at a press conference in 2013. “It is now time to return the control of our prison system to California.”
Brown’s strategy to combat overcrowding has been twofold: Send inmates to out-of-state and/or private prisons, and shift low-level offenders down to county jails, and. Predictably, this latter strategy, called “realignment,” has led to an increase in the county jail populations.
“Rather dramatically, overnight, [realignment] changed the makeup of our jails,” says Orange County assistant sheriff Steve Kea.
But Brown has been particularly resistant to one type of change: sentencing reform. While California’s voters amended the state’s Three Strikes law in 2012, without the governor’s endorsement, Brown has taken public stances against further reforms, such as SB 649, which would have given prosecutors the flexibility to prosecute nonviolent drug crimes as misdemeanors rather than felonies.
“California is, traditionally, seen as a liberal state,” says Lauren Galik, Director of Criminal Justice Reform at Reason Foundation. “But not when it comes to their sentencing laws and prison population.”
For years, the California Correctional Peace Officer’s Association (CCPOA), the prison guard union, has been one of the most powerful political forces in the state. They were a key player in the campaign to implement Three Strikes, and against the later failed campaign to repeal it. In 2010, they poured more than $2 million in independent expenditures for Jerry Brown’s gubernatorial campaign. Lynne Lyman, the state director of the California Drug Policy Alliance, says that the enormous lobbying power of the law enforcement unions has hampered serious reform in the state.
“It really doesn’t matter which party an elected official is with,” says Lyman. “The contributions that are coming in from the law enforcement associations and the private prison lobby… they’re tremendous.”
Soldier, 24, shot dead by Muslim convert Michael Zehaf-Bibeau who opened fire on Canadian Parliament in terrifying attack that left capital on lockdown. Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, 32, was shot dead after opening fire at Parliament Hill. He was born in Quebec but reportedly recently converted to Islam and had his passport seized after being designated a ‘high-risk traveler’. He shot reserve soldier Corporal Nathan Cirillo at the National War Memorial before running inside Parliament and exchanging gunfire with guards. Heroic Sergeant-at-Arms Kevin Vickers shot him dead. Police initially said there were multiple gunmen and at a press conference, they would not rule out other suspects. Witness accounts of a suspect include descriptions of him as short with long hair, overweight, wearing a dark jacket and ‘Arabic scarf’. What is the history behind the recent attack on Canada’s Parliament by reported Muslim convert Michael Zehaf-Bibeau? Why do these attacks happen? How can we stop them? Stefan Molyneux, host of Freedomain Radio, breaks down the deep history behind religious terrorism, and the relationship between ISIS, the war on terror, and modern terrorism.
Stefan Molyneux is irritated – a scathing look at the rush to judgment and fervent race-baiting in the Michael Brown shooting case. New evidence and witness testimony has emerged as the grand jury decides the future of Officer Darren Wilson in the aftermath of the Ferguson, Missouri riots.
I love the thought of “who would I be without that story?” So full of potential without a past or a future.
The Work of Byron Katie is a way of identifying and questioning the thoughts that cause all the anger, fear, depression, addiction, and violence in the world. Experience the happiness of undoing those thoughts through The Work, and allow your mind to return to its true, awakened, peaceful, creative nature. Are you ready? Everything you need in order to do The Work is available free on this website.
Investigate each of your statements on the Judge-Your-Neighbor Worksheet using the four questions and the turnarounds below. The Work is meditation. It’s about opening to your heart, not about trying to change your thoughts. Ask the questions, then go inside and wait for the deeper answers to surface. Download the Facilitation Guide for helpful sub-questions.
In its most basic form, The Work consists of four questions and turnarounds. For example, your statement might be “[Name] doesn’t listen to me.” Find someone in your life about whom you have had that thought. Then take that statement and put it up against the four questions and turnarounds of The Work.
Is it true? (Yes or no. If no, move to 3.)
Can you absolutely know that it’s true? (Yes or no.)
How do you react, what happens, when you believe that thought?
Who would you be without the thought?
Turn the thought around. Then find at least three specific, genuine examples of how each turnaround is true for you in this situation.