U.S.—Concerned citizens from all over the nation were really pitying their unfortunate lot in life that not a single individual in recent memory had risen up to warn them about the dangers of unchecked government power amid reports of gas shortages, rapidly rising prices on just about everything, and everyone in power lecturing them about pronouns and face coverings every day.
“Oh! Woe is us,” exclaimed one man waiting in an hour-long queue at a gasoline station so he could fill up grocery bags with the scarce fuel. “How did it ever come to this without even one person warning us about what would happen?”
“It’s like our government officials just did whatever they felt like doing with no regard to the Constitution and now we’re in a big mess and no one even bothered to warn us,” mourned another citizen.
“If someone had run for office warning about all these things, I would have definitely voted for that guy,” declared one woman who had lost her business and was now waiting in line to fill up her plastic bags too. “Even if he wasn’t the most charismatic or smooth-talking of the bunch. We just needed an honest guy to come around, like a sweet grandpa, and I don’t know, maybe if this honest grandpa tried to explain basic economics, obscure monetary policy, and the Constitution, and we all voted for him, maybe we’d all be better off right now. How crazy that in a country as big as ours, no one like that ever ran for office?”
At publishing time, the world continued to seem like it was on fire and it’s really a shame that no one ever warned about any of this beforehand.
I’ve been writing articles criticizing Anthony Fauci’s response to COVID-19 almost since the debacle began almost a year ago. I’ve stated publicly that he is either the most amazingly incompetent physician in America, or he’s a criminal. Perhaps both. At some point we anticipate the opportunity to ask him about the inconsistencies in his public statements and the decisions he has made that have destroyed peoples’ lives as part of the discovery process for our growing number of lawsuits. What is astonishing to me is that Fauci’s incompetence has been documented for decades before the COVID hoax was unleashed on the world while he somehow managed to maintain his powerful position.
The information provided in this article is drawn from the book I co-authored with Shane Prier, COVID Operation: What Happened, Why It Happened, and What’s Next; research I conducted on HIV/AIDS in the early 1990s; and some recent research into Fauci’s performance during his long tenure as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID).
On the surface, Fauci appears to be impressive. He graduated first in his class from Cornell Medical School. He has received many awards and accolades during his career, including The 2016 International AIDS Society President’s Award (07/19/2016). He was named a 2019 Distinguished Fellow of the American Association of Immunologists (03/22/2019), and was honored for 35 Years of Leadership in HIV Policy and Research by AIDS United’s Public Policy Council (10/02/2019).
He presents himself as knowledgeable and people refer to him as an expert. But not all is as it seems. Fauci, like many non-elected officials who hold their positions for a significantly long period of time, has made friends with many important politicians, drug company executives, and influencers like Bill Gates. His flaws include an unwillingness to admit that he is wrong, and conflicts of interest cast suspicion on his decisions. Yet he remains a powerful person, more so than most elected officials. And during his long, powerful tenure, there is no evidence that he has succeeded at anything at all. In fact, one might describe Fauci’s career as one failure after another.
Fauci and HIV/AIDS
Fauci began his career with the National Institutes of Health in 1968 and by 1977 he had risen to deputy clinical director of the NIAID. He had never practiced medicine, was not known as a great scientist or researcher, and had never managed a large agency. He did, however, have a lot of ambition and the HIV/AIDS crisis presented a great opportunity for him to gain political power.
In 1985 NIAID received a small amount of funding for HIV/AIDS, but over time this grew to billions of dollars of funding, and was a significant percentage of the total budget for the NIH.[1] Fauci’s hypothesis was that all AIDS cases were caused by HIV infection, and that his agency should focus on the development of a vaccine.
Unfortunately for Fauci, inconvenient data began to surface which showed that not all people with AIDS were infected with HIV. When confronted with the fact that 4621 clinically diagnosed AIDS patients were HIV-negative, Fauci, in conjunction with the CDC, renamed these cases as “idiopathic CD-4 lymphcytopenia (ICL).”[2]
Fauci also chose to ignore the fact that HIV /AIDS did not share common characteristics of infectious diseases, which do not discriminate based on sex. This is true of all known infectious diseases including flu, polio, hepatitis, tuberculosis, and pneumonia. AIDS, on the other hand, developed in a few high-risk groups such as intravenous drug users and gay males using recreational drugs, occurred in ten times as many men as women, and preferred gay over straight men.
Another issue is that infectious diseases spread exponentially, but AIDS did not follow this pattern either. It steadily increased from a few dozen cases in 1981 to tens of thousands over a long period of time. It did not explode and become widely spread, nor did it decline which is typical as a population gains herd immunity.[3]
In other words, Fauci ignored a growing body of evidence showing that his hypothesis was incorrect, but would not change his mind, his focus, or the activities of his agency. But that’s not all.
AZT stands for azidothymidine, a drug originally developed as a treatment for cancer. The drug was not only ineffective for treating cancer, but almost all experimental mice treated with it died of extreme toxicity.[4] The drug performed so badly that Burroughs-Wellcome did not even bother to patent it. In spite of this, the company proposed using it to treat AIDS patients based on its ability to prevent HIV from multiplying in a test tube.
Executives from Burroughs lobbied the FDA to begin clinical trials immediately. While clinical trials are supposed to be double-blind and placebo controlled, everyone soon knew which patients were taking AZT due to the horrific side effects of the drug. But the FDA approved AZT for the treatment of AIDS patients anyway, in part due to public pressure to find a cure.
Even with the known side effects of the drug, NIAID, under Fauci’s direction, decided to conduct a clinical trial of AZT on pregnant mothers with HIV who were also addicted to intravenous drugs. The trial was ended early when Fauci and his collaborators announced that they had reduced HIV transmission by two thirds – from 25% to 8% with AZT treatment.[5] The data showed that 13 out of 180 babies born to AZT-treated mothers were HIV-positive as compared to 40 out of 184 babies born to mothers given a placebo.
Fauci seemed to ignore the fact that most babies were not born HIV positive in the placebo group, and to save 27 babies, 180 mothers and 153 of their unborn babies were given a toxic drug with significant side effects. The early termination of the clinical trial meant that AZT treatment for HIV positive pregnant mothers would become a standard of care without any long-term follow-up concerning the effect on the mothers or their babies. By this time Fauci knew that HIV was not the cause of AIDS, which made the promotion of this treatment appear even more careless.
In the book Good Intentions,: How Big Business and the Medical Establishment are corrupting the Fight Against AIDS, published in 1991, Bruce Nussbaum described Fauci as a “lackluster scientist” who “found his true vocation – empire building” when he finagled himself to the head of NIAID.[6] He wrote, “Tony Fauci’s managerial incompetence had exacted a staggering cost. By 1987, more than a million Americans were infected by the AIDS virus. Not a single drug treatment had come out of the government’s enormous biomedical research system. At the end, Fauci barely survived by handing over control of the government’s only AIDS drug trial program [to a pharmaceutical company.”[7]
In 2008, after squandering billions of dollars on HIV vaccine research, and authorizing a questionable clinical trial on pregnant women, Fauci admitted that little was known about HIV. He said that out of the tens of millions of people who had been infected with HIV, there was not one documented case of a person who was infected and cleared the virus. This, according to Fauci, meant that “…we don’t even know if the body is capable of eliciting a protective immune response.” He also acknowledged that there were many people referred to as “long-term non-progressors” who are somehow able to live for a long time with the virus.[8]
Fauci and Bioterrorism
After 9/11, Fauci decided that bioterrorism was a major threat. Even though his supposed area of expertise was infectious disease, and the agency he heads is supposed to be dedicated to allergies and infectious disease, the good doctor poured billions of dollars into “Project Bioshield,” some of which was redirected from research on infectious disease. The agency reduced its grant awards by $117 million in order to fund Fauci’s new priority.[9]
There was significant disagreement in the scientific community about Fauci’s choice, with many believing that not only was the funding misallocated, but that the projects that Fauci funded posed significant risk to the general population. According to Barbara Rosenberg, a bioweapons expert with the Federation of American Scientists in Washington DC, “I think our security will decrease, because access to dangerous pathogens and expertise in working with them is going to increase vastly, and along with that will go a vast increase in the possibility of accidental escape, misuse, theft and bioterrorism.” Her concerns were not unfounded – the FBI had reported that the perpetrator of the 2001 anthrax attacks may have had links to the military’s biodefense resources.[10]
In 2007, after squandering billions of dollars of government money, Fauci admitted that the threat of anthrax was not as great as “…if you blasted off a couple of car bombs in Times Square.”[11]
Still Incompetent Today
I am not the only person who thinks Fauci is incompetent. According to a 2020 article in Science, Fauci’s “… failure-ridden search for a vaccine that can stop the AIDS virus has delivered yet another frustrating defeat. The HIV vaccine that had moved furthest along in human testing does not work, and the $104 million trial in South Africa evaluating it has been stopped early. “There’s absolutely no evidence of efficacy,” says Glenda Gray, who heads the study and is president of the South African Medical Research Council (MRC). “Years of work went into this. It’s a huge disappointment.”[12]
Fauci’s response: “We were struggling for years and years, and so we grabbed onto the slightest positive effect.”[13] He later said “I was always saying [a respiratory illness like COVID-19] would be my worst nightmare.” But as the COVID-19 debacle began, he seemed unconcerned. He first said that the Chinese virus was nothing to be concerned about, and that there was no reason to wear a mask. This was the beginning of gross mismanagement, misrepresentation, and outright lying, which seems to be Fauci’s modus operandi.
Next week: Part II The Continued Failures of Anthony Fauci
[1] The AIDS Research Program of the National Institutes of Health. Supporting the NIH AIDS Research Program. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234085/. Accessed September 1, 2020. [2] Malaspina A, Moir S, Chaitt DG et al. “Idiopathic CD4+ T lymphocytopenia is associated with increases in immature/transitional B cells and seru levels of Il-7.” Blood. 2007 Mar 1;109(5):2086-2088. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-031385. [3] Bergman DJ, Langmuir AD. Farr’s Law Applied to AIDS Projections. JAMA. 1990;263(11):1522-1525. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440110088033. [4] Lauritsen J. Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story. New York, NY: Asklepios Press; 1990. [5] Connor EM, Sperling RS, Gelber R et al. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(18):1173-1180. doi:10.1056/NEJM199411033311801. [6] Nussbaum B. God Intentions: How Big Business and the Medical Establishment are Corrupting the Fight Against AIDS Penguin Books 1991 [7] IBID [8] Nikhil Swaminathan. NIH Official: HIV Vaccine Research “Swimming in the Dark”. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nih-official-fauci-hiv-vaccine/. July 28, 2008. Accessed September 1, 2020. [9] Check E. “Boom, or Bust.” Nature 2003 Dec;426:598-601 [10] IBID [11] David Willman. New anthrax vaccine sunk by lobbying. Los Angeles Times Dec 2 2007 [12] Jon Cohen. Another HIV vaccine strategy fails in large-scale study. Science Feb 3 2020 [13] IBID
Visit Pam’s websites and sign up for her emails/newsletters:
(Natural News) What follows is a series of microscopy photos of covid swabs (a synthetic swab, then a cotton swab), a covid mask and some zoomed-in photos of mysterious red and blue fibers found in the masks.
The magnification range for these photos is 50X to 200X. Most were taken with white light, but several (as indicated) were taken with UV light.
The images shown here are 600 pixels wide. We have higher resolution images available to researchers and indy media journalists; contact us for those hi-res images.
More microscopy investigations are under way, and new images will be posted as they are finalized.
First, this series shows the carbon fiber layer of a covid mask, illuminated with UV light:
Here’s the same carbon fiber layer under white light, shown at different magnifications:
Over the weekend we published a series of nearly 40 microscope photos showing strange fibers, structures and even “hooks” that are embedded in the fibers of covid nasal swabs and masks. Many of these fibers appear to possess properties that would cause them to adhere to soft tissue such as lung tissue. Their presence in covid masks is very disturbing, given that these fibers are very likely easily inhaled and may lodge in lung tissue.
In today’s Situation Update article and podcast, I narrate these microscopy photos and explain the disturbing truth: It appears these strange fibers and hooks are deliberately embedded in masks and swabs. We do not know their purpose but they are clearly designed to latch onto soft tissue (such as lung tissue) and cause harm of some kind.
See the full article and podcast here.P.S. Tonight’s episode with The Truth About Cancer talks about detoxification, healing with heat and why some cancers are hormone-driven (and how to rebalance hormones). Register to watch all the episodes at no charge:TheTruthAboutCancer.io
Have you heard the most recent news? Bill Gates wants to DIM THE SUN to “save the planet”. The way in which this is proposed to be done is in direct alignment with the “chemtrail conspiracy theory”. It seems that once again… another “conspiracy theory” has become a conspiracy FACT! My intention behind creating and sharing this video is to highlight and emphasize the fact that we CAN put an end to this reign of darkness (quite literally, when it comes to dimming the sun) if we simply practice our freedom of choice and reclaim the power that we have as the human collective to say NO!
Note: I hope readers will forward this article to Congressman Jim Jordan’s press secretary, Russell Dye: russell[dot]dye[at]mail[dot]house[dot]gov
Recently, in a Committee hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan and Anthony Fauci crossed swords. [0]
Jordan was demanding to know, from Fauci, when the unconstitutional COVID restrictions would end. Fauci, the notorious flip-flopper, had no answers.
There is, however, a momentous issue on which Fauci has given answers. In the process, he exposed an astonishing fraud that completely changes the picture of COVID-19.
Congressman Jordan, follow this trail.
Summary: Fauci readily admitted that, if the PCR test for the virus is done improperly, the results are meaningless and must be thrown out. What he failed to say—and he knows this—is that the test, since the beginning, HAS BEEN DONE IMPROPERLY.
Takeaway: Millions of people have been falsely told they’re infected with the virus; millions of COVID case numbers are false. These false numbers have been used to declare and extend lockdowns.
If what I’m writing here is true, Congressman, would that interest you? Would that spur you to take action?
Before I lay out the details of the case, I recommend you speak with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. He knows the PCR test has been performed incorrectly. In December, he and his public health department issued an order to remedy that staggering problem. [1] [1a]
All right, here we go. Buckle up.
July 17, 2020, podcast, “This Week In Virology” (titled: “TWiV 641: COVID-19 with Dr. Anthony Fauci”) [2]: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.
Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (the question being asked of Fauci starts at the 3m50s mark; Fauci answers beginning at the 4m40s mark) [2]: “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.
Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.
That’s called a false positive.
What Fauci failed to say on the video—AND WHAT HE OBVIOUSLY KNEW—is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.
Therefore, all labs in the US, following the FDA guideline, are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…
Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…
The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.
The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.
Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.
“Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”
All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only” [3] [3a] [3b].
Note: this document is marked, “Effective: 12/01/2020.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name (2019-nCoV instead SARS-CoV-2), the document is still relevant as of Dec 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”
Here’s the CDC quote on the FDA website: see pdf page 38 (doc page 37): “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct).”
Naturally, testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”
Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [4] Here are money quotes:
“Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”
“Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”
The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients.”
Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.
Get the picture?
I hope so.
FAUCI HAS BEEN AWARE OF THIS ENORMOUS FRAUD, AND HE HAS DONE NOTHING TO STOP IT.
If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.
Finally, Congressman Jordan, what I’m reporting here only goes partway down the COVID rabbit hole. The hole is much deeper. But this is enough for now.
I urge you to use this information and help restore freedom to the American people.
“A disabled woman assisted by Kester Disability Rights has been paid £7,000 in compensation by a service provider who refused her access to a service because she was unable to wear a face mask.
The pay-out was achieved through negotiation as there was no dispute that access had been denied, or that the Claimant had a disability exemption. The only thing to be agreed was the amount of compensation, not whether it was due or not. Refusing access to people unable to wear face coverings due to disability is direct discrimination – no different to denying access to a black or gay person for example.”
Now, even though that story is in the UK, the same rights apply in the United States and many other countries!
And if you’ve been discriminated against for not wearing a mask, this should give you hope!
The first phase of the plan is uniting with people locally and having local events or meetings to support each other and help local businesses thrive again.
Also, it will help you find other like minded business owners, including lawyers, who may want to help fight back against this discrimination.
Then, you all collectively help raise money to pay those lawyers to fight on your behalf!
It is a process, but it’s a simple and effective way We The People can fight back.
When you listen to Pam’s call, you’ll hear how it’s been working for her and others in Ohio.
Imagine seeing a headline and news article similar to this, but in your area!
It can and will happen as more and more people get together and make things happen in their areas!
The other day, I had the honor of interviewing Dr. Lawrence Palevsky all about the current global situation and specifically in regards to the “you know what”. He goes DEEP!
I look forward to sharing the full film on our new platform dedicated to FREE SPEECH and EXPANSIVE KNOWLEDGE…
What's happening? 