Originally posted here
Source: The Stand | The Truth About the COVID-19 Vaccine
As your world or your government, or individuals within your government, make decisions about what is better for you, and as they try to protect you from every possible potential experience, your lives become rather cumbersome, don’t they? All you ever need is a vibration of Well-being.
Excerpted from El Paso, TX on 2/17/01
Our Love
Esther (Abraham and Jerry)
One of Biden’s executive orders imposes mask and social distancing mandates on anyone in a federal building or on federal land. The mandates also apply to federal employees when they are “on-duty” anywhere. Members of the military are included in the definition of federal employees. Will citizens of Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries where US troops are or will be “spreading democracy” be happy to learn the troops shooting up their towns are wearing masks and practicing social distancing?
Another one of Biden’s executive orders forces passengers on airplanes, trains, and other public transportation to wear masks.
Biden’s mask mandates contradict his pledge to follow the science. Studies have not established that masks are effective at preventing the spread of coronavirus. Regularly wearing a mask, though, can cause health problems.
Biden’s mask mandates are also an unconstitutional power grab. Some say these mandates are an exercise of the federal government’s constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. However, the Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the power to regulate interstate commerce. The president does not have the authority to issue executive orders regulating interstate commerce absent authorization by a valid law passed by Congress. The Founders gave Congress sole law-making authority, and they would be horrified by the modern practice of presidents creating law with a “stroke of a pen.”
Just as important, the Commerce Clause was not intended to give the federal government vast regulatory power. Far from giving the US government powers such as the power to require people to wear masks, the Commerce Clause was simply intended to ensure Congress could protect free trade among the states.
Biden also signed an executive order supporting using the Defense Production Act to increase the supply of vaccines, testing supplies, and other items deemed essential to respond to coronavirus. The Defense Production Act is a Cold War relic that gives the president what can fairly be called dictatorial authority to order private businesses to alter their production plans, and violate existing contracts with private customers, in order to produce goods for the government.
Mask and social distancing mandates, government control of private industry, and some of Biden’s other executive actions, such as one creating a new “Public Health Jobs Corps” with responsibilities including performing “contact tracing” on American citizens, are the type of actions one would expect from a fascist government, not a constitutional republic.
Joe Biden, who is heralded by many of his supporters as saving democracy from fascist Trump, could not even wait one day before beginning to implement fascistic measures that are completely unnecessary to protect public health. Biden will no doubt use other manufactured crises, including “climate change” and “domestic terrorism,” to expand government power and further restrict our liberty. Under Biden, fascism will not just carry an American flag. It will also wear a mask.
Learn this and more: https://www.TheTrueLaw.com
SSBAmerica.com
https://ssbamerica.com/all-the-handouts-for-businesses-individuals/
Subscribe To Our Channel: goo.gl/J3q9i2
Share This Video With A Friend:
VIDEO LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4SIG…
Check Out Other Videos From This Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
Daily Update #34 – Saturday, January 23, 2021
Great Patriot,
That quote in the subject line may have shocked you.
It may have been the reason you opened this email!
Well just think how a state health inspector would feel hearing those words knowing THEY could be sued in their private capacity because of enforcing these unlawful, covid related restrictions on businesses.
Would you like to hear a Constitutional Lawyer defend a business, speak with a health inspector, and talk them down in less than 5 minutes?
Keep reading because I will show you that in today’s main topic.
I have said that 2021 is the year of the Patriot.
Today’s main topic is a perfect example of why!
Let us jump right into it.
Cheers,
Jared James
https://mypatriotsnetwork.com/blog/
| “We Generate Fears While We Sit. We Overcome Them By Action.” – Dr. Henry LinkConstitutional Lawyer Rick Martin Defends A Business From Tyrannical Health Inspector Over The Phone In Less Than 5 Minutes!
If you are a business owner or you know any business owners, this may be one of the most important things you see all year. That is a bold statement, I know. But if you have a physical brick and mortar business and that is how you provide for yourself and your loved ones, but you have been restricted by government orders, then the information in today’s message could potentially save your business. And if you are a regular man or woman and you just want to be done with all these restrictions on businesses, you can help be part of the solution! Did you know business owners can stay open without any restrictions? Did you know it is against the law for the government to enforce these covid restrictions? Would you like to watch a Constitutional Lawyer speak to this fact live and on video? If so, then keep reading… Rick Martin is a well-established Constitutional Lawyer, and he has been fighting to help ensure people’s rights are protected and not stepped on by a tyrannical government. |
Rogue Snohomish barber faces big tab for his political protest

Bob Martin must pay a $90,000 fine and may lose his license after defying stay-home order in May
January 15, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
From the off-guardian, January 3, 2021, “What Vaccine Trials?” by Iain Davis:
“…the WHO protocols Pfizer used to produce the mRNA [for the vaccine] do not appear to identify any nucleotide sequences that are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When investigator Fran Leader questioned Pfizer they confirmed: ‘The DNA template does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person’.”
And there we are, right back where I started, some time ago. If you don’t have the isolated virus, how can you claim you’ve sequenced it?
And if you’ve sequenced it by ASSUMPTION and GUESS, how can you claim the sequence—or the virus—is real?
Answer: You SAY the sequence and the virus are real, but you have zero proof. Because you’re a “scientific authority,” people automatically believe what you SAY.
A man visits a vast auto junkyard looking for parts. Over the office door, he sees a sign: “1972 Ferrari 365 GTB/4 Daytona Spider. Inquire within.”
The owner of the junkyard tells him, “We’re offering shares in the Ferrari. Three thousand a share. When we eventually sell it, you’ll make at least double your investment.”
The man says, “Where is the car? I’d like to see it.”
“Well,” the junkyard owner says, “look around you. We’ve got several square miles of cars and parts. The Ferrari is out there somewhere. We recently ran a test on exhaust fumes with a special instrument. It concluded that the ’72 Ferrari had recently been driven through the yard here…”
This is the sort of thing that happens in virology.
Of course, no mainstream virologist would admit it. He would talk about analogues and gene banks and PCR and representative samples and in silico (computer modeling).
But the stark reality is clear.
Assumption and guess and slippery inference do not carry the day.
You either have the isolated virus or you don’t. If you don’t, anything you say about “it” is useless. You can’t validly claim it exists.
As I’ve written and said dozens of times now, the virological meaning of the word “isolate” is quite different from the ordinary meaning.
In the technical world of the con and the hustle, “isolated virus” means: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic drugs and chemicals, and other genetic material. Some of the cells are dying. This means the virus is killing them.”
That assertion is false. The drugs and chemicals can be killing the cells. And the cells are being starved of vital nutrients. That alone could explain the cell-death.
Furthermore, a supposed virus mixed in a soup in a dish in a lab is definitely not “isolated.”
Bottom line: there is no persuasive evidence that a virus is in the soup.
What’s in the COVID vaccine? Among other material, a supposed fragment from a supposed virus that hasn’t been proven to exist.
Consider the PCR test. Several levels of valid criticism have been aimed at the test.
First, different labs will come up with different contradictory test results. This is true.
Drilling down a little deeper, the test, when it amplifies the tissue sample taken from a patient, is useless and dangerous when more than 34 cycles or steps of amplification are deployed. Why? Because then, huge numbers of false-positives occur.
Down yet another level, we discover that the PCR doesn’t detect a virus at all. It identifies a piece of RNA presumed to come from a virus.
And finally, the test identifies a piece of RNA from a virus that hasn’t been proven to exist.
This is the root of the poisonous tree.
Source:
In mid-March 2020, many countries decided to close schools in an attempt to limit the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19).1,2 Sweden was one of the few countries that decided to keep preschools (generally caring for children 1 to 6 years of age) and schools (with children 7 to 16 years of age) open. Here, we present data from Sweden on Covid-19 among children 1 to 16 years of age and their teachers. In Sweden, Covid-19 was prevalent in the community during the spring of 2020.3 Social distancing was encouraged in Sweden, but wearing face masks was not.3
Data on severe Covid-19, as defined by intensive care unit (ICU) admission, were prospectively recorded in the nationwide Swedish intensive care registry. We followed all children who were admitted to an ICU between March 1 and June 30, 2020 (school ended around June 10) with laboratory-verified or clinically verified Covid-19, including patients who were admitted for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C, which is likely to be related to Covid-19)4 according to the Swedish Pediatric Rheumatology Quality Register. (More information on the registry and a link to the Word Health Organization scientific brief on MIS-C are provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.) The Stockholm Ethics Review Board approved the study. Informed consent was waived by the review board.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the Children with Covid-19, Including Those with MIS-C, Admitted to Swedish ICUs in March–June 2020.
The number of deaths from any cause among the 1,951,905 children in Sweden (as of December 31, 2019) who were 1 to 16 years of age was 65 during the pre–Covid-19 period of November 2019 through February 2020 and 69 during 4 months of exposure to Covid-19 (March through June 2020) (see the Supplementary Appendix). From March through June 2020, a total of 15 children with Covid-19 (including those with MIS-C) were admitted to an ICU (0.77 per 100,000 children in this age group) (Table 1), 4 of whom were 1 to 6 years of age (0.54 per 100,000) and 11 of whom were 7 to 16 years of age (0.90 per 100,000). Four of the children had an underlying chronic coexisting condition (cancer in 2, chronic kidney disease in 1, and hematologic disease in 1). No child with Covid-19 died.
Data from the Public Health Agency of Sweden (published report5 and personal communication) showed that fewer than 10 preschool teachers and 20 schoolteachers in Sweden received intensive care for Covid-19 up until June 30, 2020 (20 per 103,596 schoolteachers, which is equal to 19 per 100,000). As compared with other occupations (excluding health care workers), this corresponded to sex- and age-adjusted relative risks of 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 2.49) among preschool teachers and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.68) among schoolteachers (see the Supplementary Appendix).
The present study had some limitations. We lacked data on household transmission of Covid-19 from schoolchildren, and the 95% confidence intervals for our results are wide.
Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Among the 1.95 million children who were 1 to 16 years of age, 15 children had Covid-19, MIS-C, or both conditions and were admitted to an ICU, which is equal to 1 child in 130,000.
Jonas F. Ludvigsson, M.D., Ph.D.
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
jonasludvigsson@yahoo.com
Lars Engerström, M.D., Ph.D.
Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping, Sweden
Charlotta Nordenhäll, M.D., Ph.D.
Swedish Association of Pediatric Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
Emma Larsson, M.D., Ph.D.
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.
This letter was published on January 6, 2021, at NEJM.org.
| Supplementary Appendix | 120KB | |
| Disclosure Forms | 187KB |
Source: Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden | NEJM
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
As our world changes rapidly right before our very eyes, it has been very well established, at least for those who follow the alternative media and not the propaganda corporate media, that there is an overall plan in place that is being implemented at a very fast pace, and of course the natural questions being asked by those who realize this is: Who is behind all of this?
It is not a new plan. It is a plan that has existed for a very long time, and those who are working to implement the plan are not even hiding it anymore as we have previously reported.
It is a plan for a New World Order, and we have covered this in previous articles. See:
Those working to implement the plan have done so mostly behind the scenes throughout the years, and those who discover the leaders of this movement and dare to publish it, have either been eliminated if they were too big of a threat, or just ridiculed as “conspiracy theorists,” since they control the media and have conditioned the public for many, many years to believe the things they want us to believe.
In what is now very obviously being seen as a prophetic film, Out of Shadows exposes who the real enemy is behind all of this, and if you have not watched it yet, it is time to do so. It has been viewed by almost 14 million people on YouTube at the time of my writing this article, and even if Google takes it down off of YouTube, you will still be able to watch it on other platforms, as long as the Internet stays up.
(This has now been removed from YouTube, so we have it on our Bitchute channel.)
The producers of Out of Shadows are not the first ones to unmask the true enemy behind the New World Order, of course, so this article will provide evidence and further testimony to show who the real enemy is, and the group of people following his leadership in a group known as the Illuminati.
Continued here: Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New
points to ponder
Entertainment News & Everything In Between!
A Fan Blog in connection with TwinsBaseball.com.
the source for WordPress News, Tips and Help
points to ponder
points to ponder
Syntropy, Self Sovereignty and Radical Human Ecology
Taking personal action to end all animal exploitation by not eating, wearing or using animals
points to ponder
points to ponder
Manufacturing consent for private and public sector clients for over 250 years
points to ponder
points to ponder
points to ponder
Investigative reporting on globalism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism and where politics, culture and religion intersect.
points to ponder
points to ponder