Robert F Kennedy Jr in Berlin 28 aug 2020
Thoughts on last weekend’s London protest event, the disappointing fall-out from it, and a reminder that Evil does not have the monopoly on our shared experiences.
Details of the COVID-19 UK Truth Tour here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/22785…
This is astonishing, even by 2020 standards.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, operating under the US Department of Health and Human Services, has asserted jurisdiction over private residential leases nationwide. It intends to curtail evictions until at least the end of the year, and in fact its new directive threatens federal criminal penalties against landlords who ignore tenant “declarations” made using CDC forms.
It is unclear, to put it mildly, exactly how this jurisdiction over private contracts and state/local courts flows even to Congress, much less an administrative agency acting on its own.
One federal official justifies the bizarre and legally dubious action based on the CDC’s broad charter to stop the spread of communicable diseases—a charter at which they’ve failed miserably with covid:
Congress has delegated broad authority to HHS, the Surgeon General and CDC, to take reasonable efforts to combat the spread of communicable diseases, and frankly I think it makes sense for those authorities abroad because we don’t know for any given situation or scenario what steps will be needed to stop the spread.
I think, in this particular order, the CDC has made a very compelling case that it is quite problematic at this particular time.
It’s focused on this particular pandemic, which is obviously the uniquely powerful grasp in the nation’s entire history in terms of the effect it’s had that for a bunch of reasons in particular, that the home has been sort of the focal point of people social distancing and building, sort of a safe space themselves over the past few months, and also the fact that if people get kicked out, they may end up in overcrowded congregated living facilities or homeless shelters, and that is a potential recipe for a big spread of COVID-19.
Thanks to the oft-criticized but in fact essential Zero Hedge for the nice bit of early and original reporting here—a full day before NPR, Bloomberg, et al.—and for details from a phone conference with CDC officials.
Again, this was announced without congressional input or approval and purely by administrative decree.
At least the eviction and mortgage moratoriums in the CARES Act, passed by Congress in March, were enacted by politicians who face voters this fall. And while those earlier moratoriums may well be constitutionally suspect too, at least in times of sanity, they were limited to federally backed rentals and mortgages.
The CDC’s new action is much broader, applying conceivably to all private residential leases across the country.
The fallout from suspending rental contracts will be deep and long lasting. Many landlords will find their situations untenable and stop making mortgage and property tax payments.
New rental housing stock will be depressed, as owners worry about the next suspension of rent payments now that the precedent has been set.
After all, why wouldn’t moratoriums happen again when the next pandemic or financial crisis hits? Rental housing units will drop in price as more landlords abandon the business—setting the stage for commercial and private equity buyers to grab units on the cheap from individuals and small owners.
Ultimately, foreclosures, evictions, and tax sales will happen no matter what the federal government does. The likely outcome is bigger players owning more and more of the rental housing stock, consolidating the permanent renter class and adding to the rootlessness many Americans feel.
Even the most modest home ownership creates skin in the game and encourages better neighborhoods, while areas dominated by rentals lack the same incentives for improvement. And the new owners of rental units will pass all the uncertainty, risks, and potential losses on to millions of Americans in the form of higher rents.
Even during the most turbulent periods in American history, including the Great Depression, World War II, and an 1880s tuberculosis outbreak which killed one in seven people, virtually no one expected the federal government to suspend rent.
This action by the CDC, in response to a very manageable and retreating cold virus, is the kind of quietly unprecedented development we’ve come to expect this year.
This is a watershed moment for the US: when you destroy trust in contract enforcement you create terrible ripple effects throughout society.
Something this radical should not be rushed into place with such little forethought, especially when it amounts to buying votes in a national election. But of course in a managerial state we should expect just this type of shortsighted political consideration to prevail over good sense and justice.
The CDC wants to effectively vitiate contracts: when you tell one party that it need not perform and the other that it cannot sue for nonperformance, you radically alter the bargaining power of those parties.
The contract they signed becomes nothing more than an aspirational document, a legislative (or administrative!) tool to be rewritten at the will of politicians.
The effects of this moratorium undoubtedly will spill over in unforeseen ways as Americans get used to the idea that their financial obligations can be erased by state edict.
The tremendous costs will be borne by all of us, because when contracts are not enforceable every transaction must account for much higher risks.
Read the full article at Mises.org.
Source: The CDC Expands its Overreach and is Now America’s New Landlord T
“They want to say that is something other than what it is””
►Special thanks to Dr. Bruce Lipton.
WATCH THE FULL EPISODE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyijH…
Website – https://www.brucelipton.com
YT – https://www.youtube.com/user/biologyo…
**Read Dr Bruce Lipton’s Bestseller Book** The Biology of Belief: Unleashing the Power of Consciousness, Matter & Miracles – https://amzn.to/2UPPKPf
What Happened: Ronald B. Brown, Ph.D., from the School of Public health and Health Systems at the University of Waterloo, Canada, recently stated that the COVID-19 fatality rate is the “worst miscalculation in the history of humanity.” Brown is currently completing his second doctorate degree this time in epidemiology at the University of Waterloo.
In the paper he provides data and information he collected from his research, he compared informational texts from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to data from independent scientists and Congressional testimony. He states that “Results of this critical appraisal reveal information bias and selection bias in coronavirus mortality overestimation, most likely caused by misclassifying an influenza infection fatality rate as a case fatality rate.”
Below is a statement Brown recently gave to John C. A. Manley, a journalist who was the first to cover the story:
The subject of this article is disruptive, to say the least, although it is not as obvious from the title. The manuscript cites the smoking-gun, documented evidence showing that the public’s overreaction to the coronavirus pandemic was based on the worst miscalculation in the history of humanity, in my opinion. My manuscript underwent an intensive peer-review process. You are the first media guy who has responded to my invitation.
Dr. Brown added that CDC and WHO documents show that the case fatality rate for influenza was similar to the coronavirus, implying that the lockdowns were pointless. His paper questions why the 2017-2018 influenza season in the United States did not “receive the same intensive media coverage as COVID-19.”
The Bulgarian Pathology Association has taken the stance that the testing used to identify the new coronavirus in patients is “scientifically meaningless.” They cite an article explaining the science. You can read more about that here.
Why This Is Important. Dr. Brown is not the only one raising these points, yet it seems nobody really knows these facts because they are constantly ignored by mainstream media, who is simply presenting us with one perspective that doesn’t seemed to be based on science and data at all in my opinion. It makes one wonder, what’s really going on here?
Why are deaths not a result of the coronavirus being marked as coronavirus deaths, even when it’s clear that that the coronavirus was not the cause? This has been observed across the globe.
A number of the world’s doctors and top experts in the field have been raising their concern with regards to the measures taken to combat the novel coronavirus. For example, Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University recently criticized the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the pandemic. You can read more about that here.
More than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee” to investigate what’s happening on our planet with regards to COVID-19, expressing the same sentiment. They came together to investigate the severity of the virus, and whether or not the actions taken by governments around the world, and in this case the German government, are justified and not causing more harm than good.
You can access the full english transcripts on the organizations website if interested.
This group has been giving multiple conferences in Germany, in one of the most recent, Dr. Heiko Schöning, one of the organizations leaders, stated that “We have a lot of evidence that it (the new coronavirus) is a fake story all over the world.” To put it in context, he wasn’t referring to the virus being fake, but simply that it’s no more dangerous than the seasonal flu (or just as dangerous) and that there is no justification for the measures being taken to combat it. You can read more about the story here.
Another example would be a recent report published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus.
Reported case fatality rates, like the original official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, caused horror, panic and hysteria and were also meaningless.
Many scientists and doctors in North America are also expressing the same sentiments. For example, The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) recently published a report titled “Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.” According to them, the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%. You can read more about that and access their resources and reasoning here.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history is also part of Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee mentioned above and has also expressed the same thing, multiple times early on in the pandemic all the way up to today.
Implementation of the current draconian measures that are so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no. – Bhakdi. You can read more about him here.
John P. A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the infection fatality rate “is close to 0 percent” for people under the age of 45 years old. You can read more about that here. He and several other academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggest that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza, and published their reasoning in a study last month. You can find that study and read more about that story here.
This list goes on, and on, and on, and on..So why don’t we hear anything about it? Why are scientists, doctors and experts being heavily censored for sharing this information? Why are media outlets like us being punished and demonetized for writing about it? What’s going on here? Is there another agenda at play? Is NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden right about the fact that governments are using this pandemic to place more measures upon the population that take away our rights, all under the guise of good will? Why haven’t these measures been taken for other respiratory viruses that infect just as many, and kill just as many people and more than Covid-19 every single year?
These are important questions to ask and have a discussion around, especially when our right to even speak is slowly being taken away.
Facebook fact-checkers have made it quite clear that any information that does not come from the WHO or federal health regulatory agencies should not be considered as reliable.
Why is there so much information being shared that completely contradicts the narrative of our federal health regulatory agencies and organizations like the WHO? Is there a battle for our perception happening right now? Is our consciousness being manipulated? Why is there so much conflicting information if everything is crystal clear? Why are alternative treatments that have shown tremendous amounts of success being completely ignored and ridiculed? What’s going on here, and how much power do governments have when they are able to silence the voice of so many people? Should we not be examining information openly, transparently, and together?
Is the new coronavirus, like 9/11, a catalyst for a shift in human consciousness. Are people ‘waking up’ as a result of what has, is and will transpire?
Continue to the Collective Evolution website for more related articles!
Source: COVID-19 Fatality Rate “Worst Miscalculation” in Human History – PhD Student in Epidemiology
Some great pics and sayings on their Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/CollectiveEvolutionPage/photos/a.10151198752138908/10157731450753908/?type=3&theater
Thanks to HealthImpactNews.com for email regarding this.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. spoke to hundreds of thousands in the streets of Berlin, Germany, August 29, 2020. With Großer Stern Square and the Siegesäule Monument as a backdrop, Mr. Kennedy talked about government control by fear and spoke out against totalitarianism. He said the government and those with the greatest wealth and control have done a terrible job on public health and will shift us all to 5G and a cashless society. He said that 5G is being pushed on us as a good thing but it will be used for surveillance and data harvesting. Mr. Kennedy added that the COVID 19 pandemic is a crisis of convenience that is destroying the middle class, impoverishing us all, and it is making the powerful elite even more powerful. He closed with the message that we must protect our fellow man, our vulnerable children and our freedoms and democracy!
Today we’re going to playing CONNECT THE DOTS, covering a mysterious Rockefeller Foundation document from 10 years ago, outlining the “Lockstep” plan without falling into the obvious traps laid out in regards to misinformation, then I’ll be moving on to a curious facebook post by Victorian Premier Dan Andrews from 2017, and then we’ll wrap it all up with some current Bill Gates shenanigans to ultimately ask the question…
Do you remember signing up to be a human guinea pig?
These videos are always fully sourced. Links to sources are always pinned as top comment.
Please consider supporting my channel on Patreon: http://patreon.com/reallygraceful
Subscribe to my backup channel: http://bit.ly/reallygracefulsecondchannel Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/reallygraceful/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/reallygraceful
Twitter: https://twitter.com/reallygraceful
Instagram: http://instragam.com/reallygraceful
Rockefeller Lockstep PDF http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf Devil Bill Rockefeller https://www.history.com/news/john-d-rockefeller-father-con-man-origins
Dan Andrews FB post https://www.facebook.com/DanielAndrewsMP/posts/every-baby-born-in-2020-and-2021-will-be-invited-to-be-part-of-the-biggest-clini/1599904860074044/
Gen V project https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_5967606755001
Australian Mandatory Gun buyback program https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback
Australian Gun laws https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/act/1996/46/part2/div2/sec12
Journalisms Gates Keepers https://www.cjr.org/criticism/gates-foundation-journalism-funding.php
Eugenics and Rockefeller foundation https://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Eugenics-and-the-Nazis-the-California-2549771.php
Bill Gates predicted corona https://www.newsbreak.com/news/1495991367947/bill-gates-predicted-chinese-coronavirus-a-year-ago-with-simulation-saying-33-million-could-die-in-first-six-months
“This item first appeared at LewRockwell.com on August 22, 2020.”
August 22, 2020
Allan Stevo
Dear Stevo,
Just wanted to thank you again for your advice and encouragement regarding resistance to mandatory mask mandates.
I have an appointment with my vet this week. The vet clinic has a “mandatory” mask requirement, with which I do not intend to comply.
So I emailed the clinic an inquiry this weekend, and not having gotten a reply yet, I called and stated my concerns about not being able to wear a mask safely, as you suggested in several of your LRC articles: here, here, here, here, and here. The person to whom I spoke was most friendly and solicitous.
Turns out the “mandatory” mask policy refers to the parking lot, since the clinic is not allowing pet owners inside, mask or not.
Or in other words, the mask policy is essentially meaningless. Strike a blow for freedom, because every act of resistance makes it a little easier to assert our rights both for ourselves and for others who wish to live as free people.
Thanks again. Liberty!
– John S.
Words in English have so lost their meaning. This can be seen all around. One example is among young people — not yet having been entirely acculturated to the absolute lies of the empire that is American civilization and its outposts around the world. They find themselves in disbelief at how little the English language is useful at communicating the simplest ideas honestly and clearly.
Consequently, because of this devaluation of the effectiveness of words, there is an “inflation” that takes place among young people who are just trying to highlight important topics by saying the equivalent of “Hey, pay attention to this!”
What was once able to be stated as “Mercury is toxic,” now needs to be stated more often as “Mercury is really very toxic,” or increasingly “Mercury can literally kill you, like literally.”
The word toxic has lost some meaning. The imperatives of the language have lost meaning. The verbal exclamation points of the language have lost meaning. The word “literally” gets overused as well, at times even being misapplied. In its use, you can make fun of a young person, or you can see a fellow slave on this awful anti-thought plantation on which we exist, holding up the once honed and sharp English language and wondering why the darn dull thing can’t be very easily used to communicate.
Hemingway tried to strip the language of artifice and to use it to communicate clearly. He won a Nobel Prize in literature for this, but he failed to use language to think clearly. His life was punctuated with romance for the evil of socialism. Had he surrounded himself with a better crowd and better ideas, with his finely honed writing: how he could have soared as a timeless literary intellectual, but his philosophical foundation was so erroneous.
George Carlin called on people to end this linguistic inflationary madness in their own lives, saying that too many words were being used to communicate, simple, clear ideas and that the use of too many words to express a concept was not expressive at all, but undermines communication and is just another example of hiding the truth.
“People use extra words to make things sound more important than they really are,” said Carlin in one appearance.
In another talk about the misery caused by using euphemism to dull the language Carlin said “I bet you, if we’d have still been calling it shell shock, some of them Viet Nam veterans might have gotten the attention they needed at the time. But it didn’t happen, and one of the reasons is because we were using that soft language, that language that takes the life out of life. And it is a function of time, it does keep getting worse.”
Word inflation is all around us in the English language and words have lost so much of their meaning. I have a suggestion on how to navigate some of this.
Examples Of Word Inflation And Effective Ways To React
As a diligent student of the contemporary face mask orders, it is my strong recommendation that every reader of a compliance order view the word “mandatory” when spoken by a bureaucrat or functionary as “recommended.”
The phrase “Absolutely no exceptions!” means “Mask are advised, talk with us if that’s a problem.”
“You will be fined if you don’t comply!!!” means “We’d really like you to wear your mask, but we probably have no legal authority nor the will to fine you, especially if you claim any of the eight different exemptions to this policy, but we’d just like to express to you, and mainly to our insurance company, how incredibly serious we are about this policy, like literally.”
The sentence “You will literally kill people if you don’t wear a mask!” is similarly a demonstration of this word inflation, but it is also a cautionary message that is different from the others. It should be read as “We believe the crazy fake news, and we are unhinged. The media is more trusted than science. Perception is more important than fact. As such, we are more dangerous and destructive to society than Covid itself.” It’s my recommendation that you not interact with anyone posting such a sign, until they’ve had a long sober vacation from the media cycle and an opportunity to calm down after the 2020 elections. Timeless wisdom is applicable here: Beware. You never know what could happen when you walk through the front door of a person, who is like, really, pretty, basically crazy.
“Absolutely no exceptions!” means “We have a lot of exemptions.”
“Absolutely no exceptions!” alongside threatening, flashy, original graphics means “We have a lot of exemptions, and we also have too big of a work force with too much time on their hands at all levels of the company, not just the forty-nine-person graphic design team that made this sign, and consequently you can expect both our third and fourth quarter earnings reports to be woefully out of touch with the earnings estimates of the street. Buy puts on our stock now.”
“You must wear a mask in this store!” means “If you walk in this store twenty times without a mask, you might get called out about it three times, and we aren’t even sure if our employees will even have the courage, interest, or stamina to do that even three out of twenty times, so we posted this strongly worded sign in hopes that it would deter you, even though we know that it probably won’t deter you at all, but it may deter some people, according to a focus group conducted by a marketing consulting firm that our industry trade group Head of Communications hired to give her twenty-six-year-old, out-of-work niece something to do during the economic downturn caused by the entirely overblown governmental corona response, so our general counsel’s assistant decided to post this sign at the front door of every single one of our chains based on a Friday afternoon statement from our monetarily distracted general counsel in passing, in which she said with a very distracted and disinterested shrug three minutes before going out of town for a long weekend ‘I don’t know, I guess it can’t hurt’. This was interpreted by her assistant as ‘Immediately print this and post it at all entrances of all 1,048 locations nationally. ASAP. PDQ. Like, now!’”
Yes. These signs mean all kinds of things, but in the context of a time and place where “literally” doesn’t actually mean “literally,” the signs shouldn’t be taken so seriously and should never ever, under any circumstance, be read literally.
Don’t Take Face Mask Orders Too Seriously
All that is to say, “Don’t take face mask ‘orders’ too seriously.” Face mask orders are guidelines at best. In almost every situation, with all but the most rabid ideologues, you will get your exemption honored.
The problem with a rabid ideologue is that they believe their own hokum. Anyone who believes the hokum and falls for the narrative is doing themselves a serious disfavor.
Just look to the pragmatic out there if you want to see how not serious these face mask orders are.
You see, some savvy people are using Covid to take an extended vacation for themselves. They are happily letting the world fall for it all. Don’t expect them to protest.
Other savvy people are using it for their political gain, like Joe Biden or Kamala Harris who have called for people to just wear their masks until Biden beats Trump. Don’t expect them to protest face mask orders. Domestic disquiet is believed by pundits to helps voters usher in change. Some politicians wake up tickled upon hearing the news that yet another city burned overnight.
The vaccine manufacturers love the lockdowns because they can assure high vaccine compliance and low herd immunity rates by the time a vaccine becomes available. Don’t expect them to protest face mask rules.
I’ve identified about two dozen other groups in society who like face masks: ranging from 1.) the media, who desperately seek sensationalism to boost viewership numbers, to 2.) the dishonest, who feel more comfortable lying with a covered face to 3.) the ugly, who, let’s face it, look a lot better in a veiled face, to 4.) the dramatic, who like something to get worked up about.
You can’t expect members of any of these special interest groups to offer opposition to face mask orders. There are so many others too. They are riding the wave and will be ready to ride the next way. No fuss. They see right through the hokum, but are happy to let things continue as is. Best to keep away from the person worked up.
How To Invoke A Face Mask Exemption At The Veterinarian
Just like any other situation in which someone is claiming authority over you, a face mask requirement at the veterinarian can be handled like this.
1.) Familiarize yourself with the face mask order. This can be done as simply as stating one sentence to a manager over the phone — “I see you have a face mask requirement” — followed by a period of listening to their response.
2.) Educate yourself about the exemptions. This can be done with a quick sentence — “Do you have any exemptions to this requirement?” — followed by quietly listening to the response.
3.) If required, cite your reason for needing an exemption. A good, clear, concise sentence to use is “I am unable to wear a face mask safely.” This can be followed by a period of listening. There’s really no need to get more in depth than that.
4.) Confirm the details of the conversation. You can make sure you understood everything clearly and that everyone is in agreement on how to proceed, with a statement like this “Okay, so I can just come to your front door at 2 p.m. today and mention your name at the door, along with this conversation, and there should be no problem, is that right?”
Continue reading: http://www.52insk.com/2020/face-mask-exemption-at-vet/
points to ponder
Entertainment News & Everything In Between!
A Fan Blog in connection with TwinsBaseball.com.
the source for WordPress News, Tips and Help
points to ponder
points to ponder
Syntropy, Self Sovereignty and Radical Human Ecology
Taking personal action to end all animal exploitation by not eating, wearing or using animals
points to ponder
points to ponder
Manufacturing consent for private and public sector clients for over 250 years
points to ponder
points to ponder
points to ponder
Investigative reporting on globalism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism and where politics, culture and religion intersect.
points to ponder
points to ponder