In this video, learn all about the most dangerous disease in the world, intelligence. You’ll understand what you need to do to help slow the spread of this disease. If we all work together and follow the proper social guidelines, we can rid the world of intelligence once and for all.
The former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr Mike Yeadon, has reissued his challenge to the Health Secretary Matt Hancock regarding the coronavirus testing.
Speaking with Julia Hartley-Brewer, Dr Yeadon said the Government are “using a test with an undeclared false positive rate. That’s dreadful.
“If you don’t know what it is – shame on you.”
Dr Mike Yeadon wants those who have tested positive for coronavirus to be tested again to eliminate the possibility of the test being a false positive.
Subscribe to Dr. Pam’s weekly newsletter and video clips here! https://wellnessforumhealth.com/news/
Give us a call at 614-841-7700.
You can find Pam on BitChute under the channel WellnessForumHealth and Parler under @WellnessForumHealth
Check out our websites at https://wellnessforumhealth.com and https://makeamericansfreeagain.com/
Massive Traffic Jams Stall Paris Exodus Before Second Shutdown
Source: Massive Traffic Jams Stall Paris Exodus Before Second Shutdown
plus other excellent articles on Mercola.com!
October 30, 2020
(To join Jon’s email list, click here.)
As I keep making the case that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been proven to exist, I’m also making this point:
There is no honest and prolonged mainstream debate on this issue, and there has to be. Reputable journals should be opening up their pages to such a debate from all comers, and they aren’t. They’re ignoring, side-stepping, and suppressing a debate. This is not science. It’s not even a shadow of science.
And the COVID virus is not the first time the issue of existence has arisen. If more people understood that, they wouldn’t be so shocked.
Here are several cases from recent history:
In the early part of the 20th century, a very nasty skin disease called pellagra took hold in the American South, affecting several million people.
The elite medical view, of course: a germ was the cause. But no one could find it in the ensuing decades. Finally, a small group of independent researchers, relentlessly pursuing a different course, convinced the establishment that the true cause was a niacin deficiency.
In the 1960s and 70s, Japan experienced a strange nervous-system affliction labeled SMON. Again the clarion call was: find the virus, it must be a virus. But no, in a landmark court case, the cause was shown to be a gastrointestinal drug, clioquinol, manufactured by Ciba-Geigy. The company apologized and paid out damages. Since then, some research has suggested that clioquinol fails to explain all the SMON cases.
SARS, 2003. During the height of hysteria in Canada about this flu-like illness, famous WHO researcher, Frank Plummer, wandered off the reservation and told the press that fewer and fewer SARS patients showed any sign of having the virus—in fact, the percentage was shrinking to zero. Therefore: what virus?
Swine Flu, 2009. As I detailed in a recent article, CBS investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson uncovered the fact that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases, because the overwhelming percentage of patients’ samples coming back from testing labs showed no sign of the Swine Flu virus or any other flu virus.
HIV, first announced as the cause of AIDS in 1984, has been challenged by a number of independent researchers. I have published Christine Johnson’s explosive and detailed interview with Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia.” The subject? Does HIV exist? I’m reprinting my article and the Papadopulos interview below.
There are other illnesses in which the existence of the virus has been challenged: for example, polio and the Swine Flu of the 1970s.
Mainstream and independent investigators should also be aware there are analogous “missing causes” within the medical framework. The most egregious example is certainly psychiatry.
Following the breakthrough work of psychiatrist Peter Breggin, I’ve written extensively on this subject. In a nutshell, there are NO defining lab tests for ANY of the 300 so-called mental disorders. Every one of these disorders is arbitrarily assembled by committees of psychiatrists, from menus of behaviors. This is about as far from science as you can get.
Is there an open and honest prolonged debate about this stunning situation in the psychiatric literature? Absolutely not.
Here is my article, Does HIV Exist? Buckle up:
Before we get to Christine Johnson’s interview, a bit of background.
My first book, AIDS INC., was published in 1988. The research I engaged in then formed a foundation for my recent work in exposing the vast fraud called COVID-19.
In 1987-88, my main question eventually became: does HIV cause AIDS? For months, I had blithely assumed the obvious answer was yes. This created havoc in my investigation, because I was facing contradictions I couldn’t solve.
For example, in parts of Africa, people who were chronically ill and dying obviously needed no push from a new virus. All their “AIDS” conditions and symptoms could be explained by their environment: contaminated water supplies; sewage pumped directly into the drinking water; protein-calorie malnutrition; hunger, starvation; medical treatment with immunosuppressive vaccines and drugs; toxic pesticides; fertile farm land stolen by corporations and governments; wars; extreme poverty. The virus cover story actually obscured all these ongoing crimes.
Finally, in the summer of 1987, I found several researchers who were rejecting the notion that HIV caused AIDS. Their reports were persuasive.
I’m shortcutting a great deal of my 1987-8 investigation here, but once HIV was out of the picture for me, many pieces fell into place. I discovered that, in EVERY group supposedly at “high-risk” for AIDS, their conditions and symptoms could be entirely explained by factors that had nothing to do with a new virus.
AIDS was not one condition. It was an umbrella label, used to re-package a number of immunosuppressive conditions and create the illusion of a new and unique and single “pandemic.”
Several years after the publication of AIDS INC, I became aware of a quite different emerging debate going on under the surface of research: DOES HIV EXIST?
Was the purported virus ever truly discovered?
And THAT question led to: what is the correct procedure for discovering a new virus?
The following 1997 interview, conducted by brilliant freelance journalist, Christine Johnson, delves into these questions:
How should researchers prove that a particular virus exists? How should they isolate it? What are the correct steps?
These questions, and their answers, reside at the heart of most disease research—and yet, overwhelmingly, doctors never explore them or even consider them.
Johnson interviews Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia. Over the past decade and more she and her colleagues have published many scientific papers questioning the HIV/AIDS hypothesis…”
Here I’m publishing and highlighting excerpts from the interview. Technical issues are discussed. Grasping them is not the easiest exercise you’ve ever done, but I believe the serious reader can comprehend the vital essentials.
Christine Johnson: Does HIV cause AIDS?
Eleni Papadopulos: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.
CJ: Why not?
EP: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists.
… CJ: Didn’t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV] isolate HIV back in the early eighties?
EP: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients. [HIV is said to be a retrovirus.]
CJ: They say they did isolate a virus.
EP: Our interpretation of the data differs. To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up. Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate.
CJ: Can’t you just look down a microscope and say there’s a virus in the cultures?
EP: No, you can’t. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses.
… CJ: My understanding is that high-speed centrifugation is used to produce samples consisting exclusively of objects having the same density, a so-called “density-purified sample.” Electron microscopy is used to see if these density-purified samples consist of objects which all have the same appearance — in which case the sample is an isolate — and if this appearance matches that of a retrovirus, in terms of size, shape, and so forth. If all this is true, then you are three steps into the procedure for obtaining a retroviral isolate. (1) You have an isolate, and the isolate consists of objects with the same (2) density and (3) appearance of a retrovirus. Then you have to examine this isolate further, to see if the objects in it contain reverse transcriptase [an enzyme] and will replicate when placed in new cultures. Only then can you rightfully declare that you have obtained a retroviral isolate.
EP: Exactly. It was discovered that retroviral particles have a physical property which enables them to be separated from other material in cell cultures. That property is their buoyancy, or density, and this was utilized to purify the particles by a process called density gradient centrifugation.
The technology is complicated, but the concept is extremely simple. You prepare a test tube containing a solution of sucrose, ordinary table sugar, made so the solution is light at the top but gradually becomes heavier, or more dense, towards the bottom. Meanwhile, you grow whatever cells you think may contain your retrovirus. If you’re right, retroviral particles will be released from the cells and pass into the culture fluids. When you think everything is ready, you decant a specimen of culture fluids and gently place a drop on top of the sugar solution. Then you spin the test tube at extremely high speeds. This generates tremendous forces, and particles present in that drop of fluid are forced through the sugar solution until they reach a point where their buoyancy prevents them from penetrating any further. In other words, they drift down the density gradient until they reach a spot where their own density is the same as that region of the sugar solution. When they get there they stop, all together. To use virological jargon, that’s where they band. Retroviruses band at a characteristic point. In sucrose solutions they band at a point where the density is 1.16 gm/ml.
That band can then be selectively extracted and photographed with an electron microscope. The picture is called an electron micrograph, or EM. The electron microscope enables particles the size of retroviruses to be seen, and to be characterized by their appearance.
CJ: So, examination with the electron microscope tells you what fish you’ve caught?
EP: Not only that. It’s the only way to know if you’ve caught a fish. Or anything at all.
CJ: Did Montagnier and Gallo do this?
EP: This is one of the many problems. Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding, but for some unknown reason they did not publish any Ems [photos] of the material at 1.16 gm/ml…this is quite puzzling because in 1973 the Pasteur Institute hosted a meeting attended by scientists, some of whom are now amongst the leading HIV experts. At that meeting the method of retroviral isolation was thoroughly discussed, and photographing the 1.16 band of the density gradient was considered absolutely essential.
CJ: But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles.
EP: No. Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged, or even separated from the culture cells, for that matter. These EMs contained, in addition to many other things, including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses, a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses, and which all belonged to the same retroviral species, now called HIV. But photographs of unpurified particles don’t prove that those particles are viruses. The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.
CJ: And what was that method?
Click on the following link and scroll down to finish this article:
And, why Trump must win
(To join Jon’s email list, click here.)
ONE: Tucker Carlson announced, on his highly popular FOX broadcast, that a trove of Biden documents implicating Biden in illegal business relationships with China, the Ukraine, and other countries has gone missing. [1]
The documents were shipped through a major commercial courier, from Manhattan to Carlson by FOX staff, and somewhere along the route, the envelope was found open by courier employees—and the contents were gone.
The courier did an extensive investigation of the route and found no evidence to indicate how this happened.
Questions: Did no one at FOX make a copy of these documents? There was only one set? The docs couldn’t have been sent to Tucker electronically? Tucker should consider the possibility that someone at FOX was the culprit.
[Update: UPS found it: https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/29/ups-tucker-carlsons-lost-hunter-biden-package/ ]
TWO: “Executive Order on Creating Schedule F in the Excepted Service.” Sounds meaningless, right? It’s not. [2]
President Trump has just released a new executive order which gives him the power to fire a wide range of bureaucratic federal employees who resist implementing White House policies.
The executive order strips these bureaucrats of all sorts of built-in job protections.
It’s no secret that, since taking office, Trump has been receiving huge pushback from federal agencies, all of which are part of the Federal Branch, under his command.
If Trump wins the election, his order will stay intact. If Biden wins, he’ll cancel the order and go back to federal business as usual.
For decades, these alphabet agencies have been exceeding their legal powers by essentially making law. They do this by taking newly passed Congressional legislation and fashioning enforcement-regulations that “fit” the legislation.
Except, in practice, the agencies interpret the laws to their liking. They pervert the meaning of laws.
The American Thinker quotes the Washington Post [3]: “The directive [executive order], issued late Wednesday, strips long-held civil service protections from employees whose work involves policymaking, allowing them to be dismissed with little cause or recourse, much like the political appointees who come and go with each administration.”
“Federal scientists, attorneys, regulators, public health experts and many others in senior roles would lose rights to due process and in some cases, union representation, at agencies across the government. The White House declined to say how many jobs would be swept into a class of employees with fewer civil service rights, but civil service experts and union leaders estimated anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands in a workforce of 2.1 million.”
There is major upside and downside to this executive order.
On the one hand, the president can fire bureaucrats who resist his policies because they want to undermine him. He can also fire bureaucrats who fashion regulations that pervert Congressional legislation.
On the other hand, the president can also fire bureaucrats who are simply doing an honest job which happens to get in the way of the president’s corrupt practices.
For example, the president wants a new class of dangerous pesticides green-lighted by the EPA. The EPA refuses to knuckle under. But under threats of being fired, EPA executives “reconsider.”
Of course, big-time corporations and other actors already exert corrupt influence over these federal agencies.
On the plus side, Trump might be able to fire Tony Fauci from his long-held throne at the National Institutes of Health.
Here are two backgrounders…
ONE: Why Trump must win.
For people who want to live free lives, who know what freedom is, it’s time to acknowledge that we’re living in a new age of tyranny.
It’s not coming, it’s already here.
Developments over the past nine months have shown this. On the back of a false pandemic, states have been locked down; over a million businesses have been closed; thus, millions of lives have been destroyed or taken to the brink of destruction; large cities have been decimated.
If that isn’t tyranny, I don’t know what is.
And it’s not over. Not by a long shot. At the drop of a hat, new lockdowns can be imposed.
But understand—-human society does pass through these episodes and periods of tyranny. We are in one now. We are not immune.
So at this point, there are questions about what to do, and these questions are strategic. They are asked from the basis of realizing what we are IN and UNDER. Rule by force. Rule through deception.
The last nine months were presided over by Donald Trump. There is no escaping that fact. He gave in. He stood aside. He was grievously and criminally derelict in his duty to freedom and liberty and the Constitution. He failed to keep America open.
He will never admit it, and neither will his most ardent supporters, who weave tales of imminent Trump-rescue by “citing” his unparalleled genius and his brilliant secret plans.
Popular leaders always have legions of true believers. This is nothing new. Don’t you think, in centuries past, when kings claimed to rule by Divine Right, that their followers concocted and believed extraordinary myths justifying their kings’ monumental acts of oppression?
But from where we stand now, and the questions of STRATEGY we are facing, in this new age of tyranny, we’re looking at two men who are vying for the presidency.
Who would be worse, Trump or Biden?
Trump passively gave in. He opened the door to a coup and then stood aside.
Biden is a complete puppet of the coup. He wants to take the tyranny to a whole new level, as his masters have commanded.
Biden doesn’t require his followers to make excuses for his criminal acts—as in the case of Trump. Biden’s followers WANT those criminal acts. They want more lockdowns. They want national mask mandates. They want forced tracing, testing, and vaccination, ORDERED FROM THE FEDERAL LEVEL, wiping out any resistance from brave governors, however few they may be.
Biden’s followers want climate change to move to the top tier of the federal agenda, in the form of reduced energy-output quotas for all companies. More destruction.
Biden’s followers want more riots in cities, and widespread defunding of the police. They truly believe “social justice” movements will effect beneficial change—when, in fact, these movements are funded by the super-wealthy, on behalf of socialism, which IS an illusion of share-and-care, a covert operation leading to even greater government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich. Because treacherous billionaires will end up owning all the means of production. If you need an education along these lines, start with Gary Allen’s 1971 classic, None Dare Call It Conspiracy.
For those who think Trump is an inveterate liar through and through, Biden is easily his equal.
Periods of tyranny come from the Right and they come from the Left. This one is coming mainly from the Left with its delusional Marxist utopian fantasies. But when all is said and done, all tyrannies, no matter their disguise, no matter their brand of rhetoric, come from power at the top. And power at the top has no political ideology. Ideology is merely a tool for propaganda and mind control.
Liberty and freedom are not ideological, either. They are the outcome of thousands of years of struggle. Their adherents know individual responsibility is a key corollary. The individual is free to live his life in any way he wants to, as long as he doesn’t encroach on another’s freedom.
Trump, even in his addled and manic state, understands some part of this. Biden has given up any pretense of understanding. He now comes from the school of, “Since we know what is best for you, we’ll impose it.” And that’s assuming Biden is mentally coherent, even on his best day.
On the medical front, Trump has shown some willingness to challenge the dictates of Fauci and the CDC. Biden is solidly in the camp of, “I’ll consult the experts and follow their advice.” That is a lethal position. For example, expect him, if elected, to push for a FEDERAL mandate to impose a toxic COVID vaccine.
If enough of the public demands freedom from lockdowns and masks and distancing, Trump will go along, at least part of the way. Biden will try to crack down.
Before his brain aneurysm and pulmonary thrombosis, in 1988, Biden was a highly intelligent political operator. His brand of globalism was similar to Bill Clinton’s, but without Clinton’s self-confident flair and big bullshit front. Since 1988, Biden has gradually deteriorated. If elected, there is every chance he won’t be able to finish his term, and the dangerously corrupt hatchet woman, Kamala Harris, would take over the Oval Office.
Trump modulates his failures by maintaining a relentlessly upbeat attitude. He covers his COVID betrayal (refusing to keep the economy open) with this super-salesman’s con and shuck and jive.
All in all, we are looking at a choice of opponents in the war for freedom. Trump and Biden. Strategically speaking, the choice is clear.
Trump is the lesser foe. With a large enough outpouring of public sentiment and demand on behalf of freedom, he could become, in certain but not all respects, an ally. Don’t trust him. Try to force his hand.
In a new age of tyranny, that’s enough for now.
Presidents are not messiahs.
BACKGROUNDER TWO: The Biden agenda.
I wrote this article several years ago. It spells out one of the central ruses of our time, and it is a ruse the puppet Biden prefers, because the men who control his strings prefer it…
There are “people’s” groups all over the world who advocate the overthrow of the Oligarchs who control nations.
These people’s groups want to install socialism as the answer to Oligarchy.
That’s preposterous.
Continue reading … https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/29/ups-tucker-carlsons-lost-hunter-biden-package/
Subscribe to Dr. Pam’s weekly newsletter and video clips here! https://wellnessforumhealth.com/news/
Give us a call at 614-841-7700.
You can find Pam on BitChute under the channel WellnessForumHealth and Parler under @WellnessForumHealth
Check out our websites at https://wellnessforumhealth.com and https://makeamericansfreeagain.com/
“The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are. You trade in your reality for a role. You trade in your sense for an act. You give up your ability to feel, and in exchange, put on a mask. There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first.” Jim Morrison
“Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance” Robert Kennedy
“Lock up your libraries if you like; but there is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon the freedom of my mind.” Virginia Woolf
Masks, social distancing, censorship, economic devastation, contact tracing, mandatory vaccinations, digital health passports, Covid internment camps and a return to feudalism. This isn’t a long depressing title for a political horror movie on HBO, but rather the world that we currently live in, the one you and I have helped to co-create over the years. Years of neglect, denial, indoctrination, and passive compliance have led us here. There’s no side but the truth left to join. We’re cornered, and there’s no spin that can be put on it by corrupt journalists or mentally troubled social media coders who run your life without your permission. Left and right are figments of your imagination. We are pawns in the games that people in power play. Think about it this way: politics are the entertainment division of the global government that runs the world. You might ask why one would create a world without humanity? A world devoid of human touch fueled by fear, ignorance, propaganda, and division? A world that forces the hourly wage employees to be masked for 8 hours a day while serving unmasked wealthier consumers who breathe freely at their dinner tables. A world that rewards people who have cushy stay at home jobs they can do in their PJ’s while the father of 4 on the corner needs to close his shop, because his business isn’t considered “essential”. When looking at this paradigm it’s easy to see why one class is feeling relieved and cared for during their extended Covid staycation, and one class is being decimated.
You might be thinking: it isn’t me, it’s this idiot president we have. He’s the reason everything is so upside down. We’re gonna vote him out of office and everything will go back to normal. Well, maybe there’s another story that is worth exploring…
I remember being at Obama’s inauguration in 2009. We were filming the documentary Waiting For Superman and had an interview lined up the very weekend of inauguration. The city was insanely crowded, and bone-chillingly cold. But we didn’t care. The fact that Obama was elected was how we knew we’d be ok. Was I naive? I watched Michelle and Barack have their first dance at the inaugural ball, alongside Joe and Jill Biden. We believed in something and that night in Washington DC, after walking the length of the city in stilettos and a gown in freezing temperatures it was worth all the discomfort because we had finally arrived someplace indescribable. For a moment in time, all seemed right with the world. Our world anyway. But what about the other Americans? What about the invisible ones? The people whose families had died in 9/11, the disillusioned soldiers who fought wars based on lies, the parents of children with autism, and those children who were missing. Thousands of children go missing every year, and federal investigations are now three years deep in allegedly implicating every person of power that’s ever graced the White House. There are now whistleblowers from all three letter agency dating back to Clinton who have blown open the tightly sealed books on everything from Benghazi, to 9/11 to child pedophilia in the United States and around the world. Far bigger than Jeffrey Epstein, stories far uglier than our minds can handle. It’s too much to bear…the dirty laundry, and grizzly facts terrorize us. Is it possible we just can’t handle the truth so we’ve made a tacit agreement with the media to omit what’s too difficult to process? You protect us, and we’ll protect you kind of thing? Well, I think that unconscious agreement is about to dissolve.
Perhaps the current president is just another manifestation of the world we created, when we ignored the media that lurked outside our cool little urban cliques. As adults did we become minds that were incapable of adjusting to new information? Unable to integrate the truth into our daily lives? How much fun would cocktails on Venice Beach have been in 2002 if we actually devoted a portion of happy hour to questioning 9/11. Not a lot. In fact, that was the beginning of not being permitted to question something big and devastating in the United States. The truth is, if you were really paying attention, if you were curious, you’d have figured it out on your own. Now, there are thousands of hours of documentaries, radio shows with engineers and investigative journalists who never stopped questioning the official narrative. In fact, some say 9/11 was the beginning of the Truther movement. If this is making you angry or uncomfortable, then you’re right where you should be. You could be discovering the denial in your heart. You are coming face to face with your secrets. The ones that keep you angry, sick, and small. The very bits of you that cause your depression, anxiety, confusion and inability to truly listen to another person. That hairy monster that makes your skin crawl called the Truth, is what you deny inside of you. That’s part of the story of how we got here. Charles Eisenstein calls it the story of separation. In the story of separation, what we as individuals do is separate from what happens to the planet, or to other people. In the new story, we are all part of one living organism and what happens to the branches of one tree in South America directly affects the person sitting on a bench in New York City. If one person is enslaved, we all are.
A key component in recalling our lost power as free people is calling out censorship and removing any and all financial support from the parties, entities and political figures that have joined forces with big tech to purposefully keep Americans in the dark about the most important matters that affect our health and safety. These acts are a violation of the law and a violation of our human sovereignty and they won’t go unpunished. There is ample proof that high ranking members of Congress have been working hand in hand with big tech to deceive the American public through one of the most ruthless censorship campaigns ever witnessed in what we still oddly call a democracy. As we know, we either have freedom of speech and democracy or we have censorship and authoritarianism. Never both. Some say, “I don’t believe it.” “I don’t see censorship”. People see what they want. You may not see fluoride in your water, aluminum in the air, or glyphosate in your food, but it’s there. I became aware of the new algorithms in December 2019 when all the holistic doctors and coaches I follow online were heavily shadow banned. Shadow-banning is a technique social media engineers use to downgrade a user’s visibility to their followers. Perhaps you have 500,000 followers but your post is only seen by 8 people because the algorithms exclude anything related to 5G, viruses, and holistic healing. These are common subjects that are censored currently.
I didn’t think much about it until Covid hit. Then I thought a lot about it. From that point onward, anything and everything that was alternative was banned- especially prominent doctors around the world speaking out against the fraudulent science peddled by the CDC which then became the pretext for abusive policies to strip free people of their rights. Most mainstream viewers assume they aren’t affected by censorship if they don’t know about it. This is the type of circular reasoning that makes me want to drink hot sauce till my eyes bleed. Just a thought: is it possible you don’t know censorship exists because your searches are the result of what has been intentionally curated for you, as opposed to what’s actually organically out there? In fact, if you watched the documentary The Social Dilemma, that’s exactly what the original masterminds behind Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Google all admit. They acknowledge that they played God and decided what your personality was going to be based on the data they were mining through their search engines. They manipulated our lives, thoughts, and political opinions without us having a single clue it was happening. These particular techies who are now the godfathers of social media acknowledged that they were arrogant and that once the genie was out of the bottle they realized the horror of what they had helped create in the world and that humanity was on the brink of destruction because of it. Throughout the film, I realized that the original arrogance that led them to create a system of mind control didn’t stop once they admitted what they had done and made a confessional film about it. They still attempted to sell the message that their version of the truth is far superior than ours could ever be. Illustrative of the typical push and pull tactic of an abuser. What they excluded from the film was the most important attack on our society — the genesis of online censorship.
If you want to understand the whole story behind Google, social media and the birth of authoritarian censorship in the US, I strongly advise watching the Zach Vorheis interviews I mentioned in my first essay.
With the explosion of social media, smart phones, and gaming addictions we became unable to pry ourselves away from the ego boosts, likes, and fans of a virtual world that was at times more interesting than our real ones. Now everyone has become a celebrity in their own way. This gave way to the epidemic of narcissism that plagued our country, and seeped into every crevice of the planet. Soon cell phone towers covered the earth, and we were in a never-ending mania to upgrade and extend wifi ranges. We ignored the scientists, mothers, and doctors who pled for some oversight as chronic disease due to electro magnetic frequencies grew exponentially. We were becoming highly connected, highly disconnected, and toxic as hell faster than any species ever has before. Add reality television to the mix (which I am a guilty participant in) and we LITERALLY trained the public to be incapable of discerning fact from fiction. That was intentional and the damage hasn’t gone away. It’s only gotten worse. That’s when TV entirely bought out news, and news become nothing but entertainment. In 2011 President Obama eliminated the Fairness Doctrine which had previously called for Fair and Balanced reporting in the news. Fact, truth and integrity were no longer required by law. No one seemed to care. We were too caught up in something other than our democracy. Over the last fifteen years every last network and publication got bought out by a small handful of people and those people became your gurus. Without consent or admission, Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos turned into our masters. And we, their willing slaves. We even pay them to enslave us! Soon Orwellian mantras life “safer at home” and “do your part” repeated in the news day after day (the very definition of programming) would become our own. Other people’s memes on social media would replace original ideas we were once proud of. Art would become watered down, because truth fuels creativity and suppression of it fuels artistic laziness. Find the truth and you’ll find the greatest piece of art you’ve ever created. You’ll probably find many creative outlets you never knew existed inside you. Because you are a child of God, and your truth can never be suppressed. Ever. Find it, nurture it, believe in it, and never let it go ever again.
Remember the weapons of mass destruction we never found in Iraq? Remember the mainstream media programming you to link Iraq and 9/11 even though there was no proof? Remember the Vietnam War? The infamous incident at the Gulf of Tonkin? That NEVER actually happened! Historically, crimes against humanity have been sold to the Unites States in a package of lies so we would send innocent soldiers to perish for no reason other than to placate the US egos that run the country. The 2008 recession can otherwise be known as the biggest wealth transfer in history. And now Covid. According to every medical journal to date, including the New England Journal of Medicine and also the CDC, the Covid 19 virus has never been isolated. Therefore, the PCR test we use relentlessly to determine positive cases (which have a 93% false positive rate), are rendered entirely useless. Remember, a goat and a papaya tested positive for Covid 19. Remember how in 2020 the flu miraculously disappeared? Note that now thousands of home videos have been made of PCR tests being sent off to the lab after swabbing a puddle or a pet, and have come back positive for Covid 19. We’ve been through this deception now so many times that I believe humanity is finally being forced to evolve. It’s being called ‘The Great Awakening’ and its been going on since 9/11, which was the first big authoritarian power grab that changed us as Americans. After 9/11, we no longer felt we deserved privacy so we gave it away for the illusion of safety. This in turn paved the road for complete and total government control, as we’re experiencing today. None of this would be conceivable or possible without 9/11. Do you still believe that having your privacy stolen and sold is reasonable? Are you safer now?
We are being forced to confront our own troubled minds and the reasons why we look the other way as often as we do when we are being called to do just the opposite. It’s the same players, selling you the same fear theatre, assuming you will continue to fall for the same old tricks. But maybe not today. We allow other people to do our dirty work for us. The Abbie Hoffmans, the MLKs, the Bobby Kennedys, the RFK Jrs, the Rachel Carsons, the Mikki Willises, the Delores Cahills . They can’t do it alone. So if there’s one thing you and I can do to assist our culture in evolving beyond the illusions of equality and democracy that have plagued our history, simply take baby steps into the truth. Read or listen to one piece of news outside mainstream media and outside your comfort zone. When I say mainstream media I am referring to any piece of news or media that is funded by advertisers. That includes NPR, BBC, ALL of the TV networks, both cable and local, and ALL US newspapers. Use the list below as a guide, and take it from there. Dig around, be your own detective. Try spending one hour in nature without any distractions and ask the question: am I living in alignment with nature? Are my thoughts and actions congruent with a system higher than the government? Although it may be scary and disheartening at first, It will ultimately free you to achieve your full potential here on planet earth. The idea that we’re “all in this together” means the very opposite of having your face covered. It means now more than ever, be brave and speak your truth. The brutal dictatorship that has taken hold in parts of Australia amplify this notion of where we go one we go all. Our governments are no longer separate. We seem to be moving into a world governance system put in place by the UN and backed by the WHO and the World Bank. It appears that Australia, the UK, Canada and several states in the US (California and NY) are pilot programs. Every few weeks they outdo each other with outrageous dictatorial mandates of their confused citizens. Just the other day King Newsom proclaimed that Californians could only have a total of six guests to their homes for two hours maximum (provided there’s no singing), and they must maintain a six feet distance from one another even outside. I’ve known many people who have grown up in punishing communist countries and this is more draconian than any holiday story I’ve ever heard of in any of those countries. You say, well maybe they weren’t experiencing a pandemic. Again, in a free country there is no circumstance where people’s civil liberties can be stripped. Especially in light of the lack of fact that this virus has a lower fatality rate than the flu. Have you even been told how to host Thanksgiving if someone had the flu? Absurd.
Continue reading … https://thetruthfilms.com/didweco-createourcurrentreality/
Learn about viral interference, mandated vaccines, & the global state of affairs. There is hope: “We’re starting to make progress!”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126676/
Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as virus interference. Test-negative study designs are often utilized to calculate influenza vaccine effectiveness. The virus interference phenomenon goes against the basic assumption of the test-negative vaccine effectiveness study that vaccination does not change the risk of infection with other respiratory illness, thus potentially biasing vaccine effectiveness results in the positive direction. This study aimed to investigate virus interference by comparing respiratory virus status among Department of Defense personnel based on their influenza vaccination status. Furthermore, individual respiratory viruses and their association with influenza vaccination were examined.
We compared vaccination status of 2880 people with non-influenza respiratory viruses to 3240 people with pan-negative results. Comparing vaccinated to non-vaccinated patients, the adjusted odds ratio for non-flu viruses was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 1.09; p = 0.60). Additionally, the vaccination status of 3349 cases of influenza were compared to three different control groups: all controls (N = 6120), non-influenza positive controls (N = 2880), and pan-negative controls (N = 3240). The adjusted ORs for the comparisons among the three control groups did not vary much (range: 0.46–0.51).
Receipt of influenza vaccination was not associated with virus interference among our population. Examining virus interference by specific respiratory viruses showed mixed results. Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however, significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections.Keywords: Influenza vaccine, Virus interference, Department of Defense, Respiratory illnessAbbreviations: DoD, Department of Defense; DoDGRS, The Department of Defense Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance Program; GEIS, Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System; DHA/AFHSB, AF, The Defense Health Agency/Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch, Air Force Satellite Cell; USAFSAM, United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine; LRMC, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center; RSV, Respiratory Syncytial Virus; AFCITA, Air Force Complete Immunization Tracking Application; OR, Odds Ratio; 95% CI, 95% Confidence IntervalGo to:
The influenza pandemic of 1918–1919, which contributed to an estimated 50 million deaths worldwide, stimulated interest in influenza vaccine research [1]. Twenty years after the pandemic began, the first influenza vaccine was administered to US soldiers in 1938 [1]. From the 2010–2011 influenza season to the 2017–2018 season, excluding for the 2014–2015 season, the influenza vaccine was shown to be effective at reducing the burden of seasonal influenza in the United States [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].
While influenza vaccination offers protection against influenza, natural influenza infection may reduce the risk of non-influenza respiratory viruses by providing temporary, non-specific immunity against these viruses [7], [8]. On the other hand, recently published studies have described the phenomenon of vaccine-associated virus interference; that is, vaccinated individuals may be at increased risk for other respiratory viruses because they do not receive the non-specific immunity associated with natural infection [7], [8], [9], [10]. There has been limited evidence that the influenza vaccine may actually be associated with the virus interference process [8], [11]. Other studies have found no association between influenza vaccination and increased respiratory virus risk [10], [12].
The purpose of this study is to add to the general knowledge of influenza vaccine-related virus interference by comparing rates of non-influenza respiratory viruses to negative laboratory tests, and comparing vaccination status of influenza positive cases to controls among Department of Defense (DoD) personnel. The DoD provides a unique population for vaccination studies as mandatory vaccination against influenza is required by the DoD for all Active Duty and Reserve Component personnel [13]. This study aims to examine the relationship between specific respiratory viruses and influenza vaccination. The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved as exempt by the Air Force Research Laboratory Institutional Review Board.Go to:
The Department of Defense Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance Program (DoDGRS) is a DoD-wide program established by the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (GEIS). The program was founded in 1997 as an influenza-only surveillance program. In the 2013–2014 influenza season the program added respiratory Film Array for flu negative samples and began identifying other respiratory pathogens. Starting in the 2017–2018 influenza season, the program added Luminex Film Array capabilities to test for respiratory pathogens, and became known as DoDGRS. The Defense Health Agency/Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch – Air Force Satellite Cell (DHA/AFHSB – AF) and United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM) manage the surveillance program that includes global surveillance among DoD beneficiaries at 79 sentinel sites (including deployed locations) and many non-sentinel sites. Laboratory testing completed at USAFSAM and Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC) included multiplex PCR respiratory pathogen panels (including: adenovirus, Chlmydia pneumoniae, coronavirus, human bocavirus, human metapnumovirus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinovirus/enterovirus, and co-infections) [14], [15], viral culture detecting influenza and other respiratory viruses, and influenza A/B subtyping via PCR [16], [17]. Vaccination status was derived from both the Air Force Complete Immunization Tracking Application (AFCITA), a United States Air Force database containing vaccination-related data, and from surveys given to those submitting respiratory samples. If the patient had an influenza vaccination record in AFCITA for the 2017–2018 influenza season, or answered yes to being vaccinated during the season on their survey, they were identified as vaccinated. Patients who were not vaccinated for the season or who were vaccinated less than 14 days prior to specimen submittal were classified as unvaccinated.
All people submitting a respiratory specimen to the DoDGRS for the 2017–2018 influenza season were eligible for the study. The influenza season began 1 October 2017 and ended 29 September 2018. Those who submitted a sample and only tested positive for Chlamydia pneumoniae and/or Mycoplasma pneumoniae were excluded because these illnesses are bacteriological in nature, not viral. People with influenza and non-influenza coinfections were excluded because they could not be uniquely classified as either influenza or non-influenza respiratory virus. Individuals with multiple specimens collected during the season were also removed from the study as they could have had multiple different viruses over the season. Specimens where neither vaccination status could be obtained via databases nor a questionnaire was completed were excluded because vaccination status could not be confirmed. Subjects who were ill before receiving vaccination were excluded as vaccination status would therefore be unrelated to illness. Lastly, those people for whom the laboratory rejected the specimen were not included in the final study population.
Data management and statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 and SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Basic descriptive epidemiology was utilized to obtain counts and rates of outcomes by sex, military beneficiary category, age group, disease status, seasonality of illness, and vaccination status. In order to determine if virus interference was associated with influenza vaccination in the military beneficiary population, odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated utilizing conditional logistic regression to compare vaccination status from two analyses. First, those with a viral respiratory illness other than influenza were compared to those with no pathogen detected (pan-negative). Next influenza positive cases were compared to three different control groups. The first control group was comprised of all controls, specifically, individuals testing negative for flu or positive for any respiratory virus other than flu. The second control group consisted of only those who were positive for respiratory viruses other than influenza. Lastly, pan-negative controls were compared to influenza cases. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were calculated for the overall population, the population with AFCITA records only, and the active duty only population during the influenza season for the comparison of other respiratory illnesses to pan-negatives, as well as all three case-control comparisons. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated after modeling variables in a nested logistic regression, keeping all variables with p < 0.20 and then adding them to a full logistic model. In the full logistic model, only variables that remained significant were included in the final adjusted model. Age group remained significant in the overall population; age group and seasonality remained significant in the AFCITA confirmed vaccination group and the Active Duty population; and gender, age group, and seasonality all remained significant in all three of the case-control comparisons. Those respective variables that remained significant were included in the adjustment for the odds ratio for the total season. Individual respiratory virus outcomes were also examined and stratified by vaccination status. Odds ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values were calculated to determine if individual respiratory viruses were associated with influenza vaccination.Go to:
For the 2017–2018 influenza season, 4041 out of 11,943 specimens tested positive for influenza (33.8%) (Data not shown). There were 3869 specimens identified as other respiratory pathogens (32.4%). The remaining 4033 specimens resulted as negative (33.8%) (Data not shown). Of the 11,943 specimens, 2474 (20.7%) specimens were excluded from our population based on the exclusionary criteria described in the Methods section, leaving a final study population of 9469 unique people (Data not shown). The study population was predominantly male, Active Duty service members, aged 18–35 years old (Table 1, Table 2 ). A majority of the study population was vaccinated (Table 1, Table 2). Most respiratory specimens were analyzed during the winter (December, January, and February) months (Table 1, Table 2).
Continue reading on website: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126676/
points to ponder
Entertainment News & Everything In Between!
A Fan Blog in connection with TwinsBaseball.com.
the source for WordPress News, Tips and Help
points to ponder
points to ponder
Syntropy, Self Sovereignty and Radical Human Ecology
Taking personal action to end all animal exploitation by not eating, wearing or using animals
points to ponder
points to ponder
Manufacturing consent for private and public sector clients for over 250 years
points to ponder
points to ponder
points to ponder
Investigative reporting on globalism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism and where politics, culture and religion intersect.
points to ponder
points to ponder
What's happening? 