Trump Biden Pence Harris Debate Election 2020 Supreme Court Economy | Robert David Steele

๐Ÿšจ Alerts โ€“ Election 2020 Debates & Core Issues ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
๐Ÿ“ง ๐—š๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น ๐—”๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ & ๐—จ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜ https://bit.ly/3gKjVPR
๐Ÿค ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฝ #๐—จ๐—ก๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—š ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐—ฎ๐˜ https://TheSteeleReport.com
๐Ÿ’ฅ ๐Ÿฑ๐—š ๐——๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ & ๐—˜๐— ๐—™ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐˜ https://bit.ly/34schWS
๐—”๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ผ
Robert discusses Trump Biden cancelled debates, Pence Harris anemic debates, and a new article on the core issues that will determine the winner: Trump. He reiterates the need for Trump to fire the two party tryanny debates commission, restoring the League of Women Voters while debating — with or without Biden — the Libertarian, Green, and an Independent candidate; throw in #UNRIG as a commitment to Independents, Libertarians, and others that they get a fair share of Congress in 2022 and it is GAME OVER.
๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐—ง๐—ผ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต
๐Ÿ’ฅ ๐Ÿฑ๐—š ๐——๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – ๐—˜๐— ๐—™ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐˜ https://youtu.be/pdMyuHHx1gA
๐Ÿ’ฅ ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ป ๐—”๐˜๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜ https://youtu.be/VSkvjpztCFA
๐Ÿ’ฅ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—”๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ https://youtu.be/iBnTV33VLXc
๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€
๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ‘‰ YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/RobertDavidSt… ๐Ÿ‘‰ Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/RobertDavidS… ๐Ÿ‘‰ Twitter: https://twitter.com/OSSRobertSteele
๐—”๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ
Robert David Steele is a former US Marine, CIA spy, and co-founder of the US Marine Corps Intelligence Activity. He is a top non-fiction book reviewer with over 2,000 reviews across 98 categories of reading, all reviews are free online.
To learn more about Robert go to https://RobertDavidSteele.com
๐Ÿ“ง ๐—š๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น ๐—”๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ & ๐—จ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐˜ https://bit.ly/3gKjVPR
๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ช๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€ – ๐—˜๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ด ๐—ฃ๐—ถ๐—ป https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS…
๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ข๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป (๐—–๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—”) – ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ Website (Learn, Join, Donate): https://cspoa.org
๐—•๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—”๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป
Product Lines: Energy Wellness & 5G EMF Protection
Use discount code RDS007 for 20% OFF purchase.
๐—›๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐˜† ๐— ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜…๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ
Product Line: Nutrousa Detoxacreme
Use discount code UNRIG for 10% OFF purchase

Which New Normal Do You Want?? | Dr. Pam Popper

Subscribe to Dr. Pamโ€™s weekly newsletter and video clips here!ย https://wellnessforumhealth.com/news/
Give us a call at 614-841-7700.
You can find Pam on BitChute under the channel WellnessForumHealth and Parler under @WellnessForumHealth

Rabbi’s Viewpoint 2020: Faith in the Age of COVID – Rabbi E. David Smith hosted by Stephanie Locricchio

Man, husband, father of 7, Rabbi, attorney (transactions, IP and litigation), independent thinker working with good people, candidate for 9th Cong. Distr. of NJ

https://thriveglobal.com/stories/ancient-principles-of-mindfulness-for-the-modern-world-with-e-david-smith/

Ancient principles of mindfulness for the modern world with E. Davidย Smith, Esq.

There is an ancient Jewish practice to start the day with the words, โ€œModeh Ani,โ€ an expression of gratitude to our Creator and the forging of a deep personal connection. Interestingly, this recitation ends with an expression of our Creatorโ€™s faith in usโ€Šโ€”โ€Šin other words, it is a reminder of who we really are. E. [โ€ฆ]
The Thrive Global Community welcomes voices from many spheres. We publish pieces written by outside contributors with a wide range of opinions, which donโ€™t necessarily reflect our own. Community stories are not commissioned by our editorial team, and though they are reviewed for adherence to our guidelines, they are submitted in their final form to our open platform. Learn more or join us as a community member!

https://www.facebook.com/edavid.smith

 

MAJOR SUCCESSES of THE HEALTHY AMERICAN — Peggy Hall at the OC PATRIOT RALLY

THE HEALTHY AMERICANS are making waves!! Join us to get your action steps and valuable documents and handouts: http://www.thehealthyamerican.org/subscribe
We need your support to keep this ship afloat!
http://www.thehealthyamerican.org/take-action

Get on the email list as I send out everything that way
And join our meet up groups!
http://www.thehealthyamerican.org/meet-up-groups

Vaccination: Whatโ€™s Trust Got To Do With It? – Dr. Joseph Mercola on LewRockwell.com

As the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) prepares to host the three-day, three-night Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination that will be broadcast online October 16 through 18, 2020, the theme we have chosen is โ€œProtecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century,โ€ because at no time in modern history has it been more important for all of us to take a stand and do just that. This year, the orchestrated actions by governments around the world to restrict or eliminate civil liberties in response to the emergence of a new coronavirus has been unprecedented, and has had profound effects on theย global economy and on the physical, mental and emotional health of billions of people.1

By mid-September 2020, there were about 29 million cases of the new Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) reported worldwide with about 925,000 associated deaths.

The United States, the third most populated country in the world at 330 million people, had recorded over 7 million cases and 198,000 deaths, with an estimated 598 deaths per million people, which is a higher death rate per million people than Sweden,2ย where health officials have refused to order masking or lock down the country and allowed the population to acquire natural herd immunity to the virus.3,4

Overall COVID-19 Mortality Is Less Than 1%

According to the World Health Organization, the overall infection mortality rate for the new SARS coronavirus causing COVID-19 is about 0.6%,5ย although some scientists say it is lower,6ย while others estimate it can be as high as 1 to 2% in some parts of the world.7

Compared to Ebola with a 50% mortality rate8ย or smallpox that killed 30%,9ย or tuberculosis that still is a deadly disease killing 20% to 70%,10ย or diphtheria at 5% to 10%,11ย or the 1918 influenza pandemic with a 2.5% mortality rate,12ย COVID-19 is near the bottom of the infectious diseases mortality scale with a less than 1% mortality rate in most countries.

Those at highest risk for complications and death include the elderly and those with one or more poor health conditions.13

The CDC recently reported that only 6% of COVID-19-related deaths were solely due to coronavirus infection and 94% of the people who died also had influenza or pneumonia; heart, lung or kidney disease; high blood pressure; diabetes, or another underlying poor health condition.14ย Most studies suggest it is rare for children to suffer complications and die from COVID-19.15

But seven months after the World Health Organization (WHO)16ย declared a coronavirus pandemic,17ย and public health officials persuaded lawmakers to turn the world upside down, a lot of people are asking questions and so are doctors who disagree with each other about the facts. Questions like:

Where did the new respiratory virus come from?

The most popular narratives about the mutated coronavirus is that it either jumped out of a bat or another animal in a Chinese wet food market18,19ย or escaped out of a biohazard lab in 2019,20,21ย but scientists continue to argue about which scenario is more likely.22ย And this question:

If I wear a cloth facemask, does it really prevent me from getting infected with or transmitting COVID-19?

There is an ongoing debate in the medical community about whether it is a good idea for all healthy children and adults to wear cloth masks when they leave their home.23ย In March 2020, the U.S. Surgeon General ordered the American public to stop buying and wearing masks because โ€œthey are not effective in preventing general public from catching coronavirusโ€24ย and โ€œactually can increase the spread of coronavirus,โ€ which was the position of the World Health Organization.25

But in April, the CDC walked back its โ€œdo not maskโ€ order and urged all healthy Americans to voluntarily wear homemade cloth face coverings when entering public spaces.26

In June, the WHO was continuing to say that, โ€œAt the present time, the widespread use of masks everywhere is not supported by high-quality scientific evidence, and there are potential benefits and harms to consider โ€ฆ Masks on their own will not protect you from COVID-19.โ€27

But by June, a number of state Governors and local governments had mandated facemask wearing and an epidemic of mask shaming had begun,28,29ย which led to public protests against masking mandates.30ย In August, the CDC doubled down and expanded face masking directives to include all children over the age of 2,31ย while the WHO warned that children under the age of 6 should not wear masks but children over age 12 should.32

So, confusion reigns. While some scientists are saying that if all healthy people are forced to wear face masks it will not stop the coronavirus pandemic and gives a dangerous and false illusion of safety,33ย other scientists are demonizing the refusers, alleging that people refusing to mask up are โ€œsociopathicโ€ and have lower levels of empathy.34

About 30 U.S. states require masking for young children and adults who enter public spaces,35ย and some states are leveling steep fines of up to $1,000 or threatening jail time for anyone who fails to comply.36

Washington state has made not wearing a mask in public a misdemeanor crime37ย and central Texas officials say they wish they could put people in prison for refusing to wear a mask.38ย More than 50 countries in the world now require people to cover their faces when they leave home and some do fine and imprison people who go outside without wearing a mask.39

So, what about getting tested for COVID-19? The CDC says that people should get tested if they have COVID-19 symptoms or have been in contact with someone who has been diagnosed with the infection. There is also an antibody test to identify whether or not you have been infected in the past.40ย But lab tests are not always reliable and people are asking this logical question:

If I get a lab test, will it accurately identify if I am currently infected or have been infected with COVID-19 in the past?

โ€ฆ Continue reading โ†’

Source: Vaccination: Whatโ€™s Trust Got To Do With It? – LewRockwell

Also see Dr. Mercola’s website: https://www.mercola.com/

Nasal Swab Testing Insanity โ€“ DONโ€™T DO IT!

Nasal Swab Testing Insanity โ€“ DONโ€™T DO IT!

Taking a COVID nasal swab test will increase the number of false positives (via the discredited PCR test), thus providing false justification for the psychopaths to prolong this nightmare indefinitely. This is why youโ€™re seeing a push in every community to get tested. DONโ€™T DO IT! The World Economic Forumโ€™s economic reset plan based on a mind virus could go on indefinitely, but thatโ€™s largely dependent upon the publicโ€™s compliance and complicity.

Excerpt from Shaking My Head Productions 2
Video editing by debess
Original video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFWbf_IXsDw

LESS
Category Education
Sensitivity Normal – Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over

Source: debess

About the DOD Military Resettlement Document, Feb., 2010

About the DOD Military Resettlement Document, Feb., 2010

Source: debess

The Evidence Keeps Piling up: Lockdowns Donโ€™t Work

Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
The toll lockdowns have taken on human life and human rights has been incalculable. Increases inย child abuse, suicide, and evenย heart attacks, all appear to be a feature of mandatory stay-at-home orders issued by politicians who now rule by decree without any legislative or democratic due process. And then, of course, there is the economic toll on employment,ย which will feed negative impacts into the longer term. The economic burden has fallen theย most on the youngย and on working-class families, whose earners are least able to work from home.

These measures also haveย made a mockery of basic human rightsย while essentially expropriating private property. Mom-and-pop business owners were told to shut their doors indefinitelyย or face arrest. The unemployed were told it was now illegal to work for a living if their careers were deemed โ€œnonessential.โ€ Policeย officers have beaten citizensย for not โ€œsocial distancingโ€ whileย mothers have been manhandledย by cops for attempting to use playground equipment.

This was all done because some politicians and bureaucratsโ€”who were in no danger of losingย theirย large paychecksโ€”decided it was a great idea to carry out a bizarre and risky experiment: forcing large swaths of the population to stay at home in the name of preventing the spread of disease.

An Experiment Concocted by Governments

Indeed, politicians have long dreamed of forcing people into isolationย en masse. But this was most recently revived during the George W. Bush administration. As theย New York Timesย reported in April:

Fourteen years ago, two federal government doctors, Richard Hatchett and Carter Mecher, met with a colleague at a burger joint in suburban Washington for a final review of a proposal they knew would be treated like a piรฑata: telling Americans to stay home from work and school the next time the country was hit by a deadly pandemic.

Drs. Hatchett and Mecher were proposingโ€ฆthat Americans in some places might have to turn back to an approach, self-isolation, first widely employed in the Middle Ages.

How that idea โ€” born out of a request by President George W. Bush to ensure the nation was better prepared for the next contagious disease outbreak โ€” became the heart of the national playbook for responding to a pandemic is one of the untold stories of the coronavirus crisis.

The concept of social distancing is now intimately familiar to almost everyone. But as it first made its way through the federal bureaucracy in 2006 and 2007, it was viewed as impractical, unnecessary and politically infeasible.

Lockdowns Donโ€™t Work

And why was it considered impractical and unnecessary? There is more than one reason, but one major reason is that lockdowns have never been shown to be particularly effective. And this lack of success in containment must also be weighed with the very realย costs of forced isolation. This was explained in a 2006 paper inย Biosecurity and Bioterrorismย called โ€œDisease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenzaโ€ by Thomas V. Inglesby, Jennifer B. Nuzzo, Tara Oโ€™Toole, and D.A. Henderson. The authors conclude:

There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for extended periods in order to slow the spread of influenza. A World Health Organization (WHO) Writing Group, after reviewing the literature and considering contemporary international experience, concluded that โ€œforced isolation and quarantine are ineffective and impractical.โ€ Despite this recommendation by experts, mandatory large-scale quarantine continues to be considered as an option by some authorities and government officials.

The interest in quarantine reflects the views and conditions prevalent more than 50 years ago, when much less was known about the epidemiology of infectious diseases and when there was far less international and domestic travel in a less densely populated world. It is difficult to identify circumstances in the past half-century when large-scale quarantine has been effectively used in the control of any disease. The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme (forced confinement of sick people with the well; complete restriction of movement of large populations; difficulty in getting critical supplies, medicines, and food to people inside the quarantine zone) that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration.

Not surprisingly, then, itโ€™s now becoming apparent that lockdowns donโ€™t work when actually tried. Earlier this month, for example, Donald Luskin noted in theย Wall Street Journal:

Measuring from the start of the year to each stateโ€™s point of maximum lockdownโ€”which range from April 5 to April 18โ€”it turns out that lockdowns correlated with a greater spread of the virus. States with longer, stricter lockdowns also had larger Covid outbreaks. The five places with the harshest lockdownsโ€”the District of Columbia, New York, Michigan, New Jersey and Massachusettsโ€”had the heaviest caseloads.

Basically, Luskin searched for a clear correlation between lockdowns and better health outcomes in relation to covid-19. He found none. He continues:

It could be that strict lockdowns were imposed as a response to already severe outbreaks. But the surprising negative correlation, while statistically weak, persists even when excluding states with the heaviest caseloads. And it makes no difference if the analysis includes other potential explanatory factors such as population density, age, ethnicity, prevalence of nursing homes, general health or temperature. The only factor that seems to make a demonstrable difference is the intensity of mass-transit use.

We ran the experiment a second time to observe the effects on caseloads of the reopening that began in mid-April. We used the same methodology, but started from each stateโ€™s peak of lockdown and extended to July 31. Confirming the first experiment, there was a tendency (though fairly weak) for states that opened up the most to have the lightest caseloads. The states that had the big summer flare-ups in the so-called โ€œSunbelt second waveโ€โ€”Arizona, California, Florida and Texasโ€”are by no means the most opened up, politicized headlines notwithstandingโ€ฆ.

[T]hereโ€™s no escaping the evidence that, at minimum, heavy lockdowns were no more effective than light ones, and that opening up a lot was no more harmful than opening up a little. So whereโ€™s the science that would justify the heavy lockdowns many public-health officials are still demanding?

This is just the most recent of many studies of this sort.

Aย July study published byย The Lancetย concluded: โ€œThe authors identified a negative association between the number of days to any lockdown and the total reported cases per million, where a longer time prior to implementation of any lockdown was associated with a lower number of detected cases per million.โ€

In April, T.J. Rogers looked at โ€œa simple one-variable correlation of deaths per million and days to shutdownโ€ย and foundย that โ€œThe correlation coefficient was 5.5%โ€”so low that the engineers I used to employ would have summarized it as โ€œno correlationโ€ and moved on to find the real cause of the problem. (The trendline sloped downwardโ€”states that delayed more tended to have lower death ratesโ€”but thatโ€™s also a meaningless result due to the low correlation coefficient.)โ€

In May, Elaine He at Bloombergย showedย โ€œthereโ€™s little correlation between the severity of a nationโ€™s restrictions and whether it managed to curb excess fatalities.โ€

In an August 1 study, also published byย The Lancet, the authorsย concluded, โ€œRapid border closures, full lockdowns, and wide-spread testing were not associated with COVID-19 mortality per million people.โ€

A June studyย published inย Advanceย by Stefan Homburg and Christof Kuhbandner found that the data โ€œstrongly suggests” that

the UK lockdown was both superfluous (it did not prevent an otherwise explosive behavior of the spread of the coronavirus) and ineffective (it did not slow down the death growth rate visibly).

In fact, the overall trend of infection and death appears to be remarkably similar across many jurisdictions regardless of what nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are taken by policymakers.

In a paperย published with the National Bureau of Economic Researchย (NBER), authors Andew Atkesonย et al.ย found that covid-19 deaths followed a similar pattern โ€œvirtually everywhere in the worldโ€ and that โ€œFailing to account for this familiar pattern risks overstating the importance of policy mandated NPIs for shaping the progression of this deadly pandemic.โ€

Along these lines, Simon Wood,ย examinedย the progression of the disease in the United Kingdom and in Sweden and found that the data

strongly suggest that the decline in infections in England and Wales began before full lockdown, and that community infections, unlike deaths, were probably at a low level well before lockdown was eased. Furthermore, such a scenario would be consistent with the infection profile in Sweden, which began its decline in fatal infections shortly after the UK, but did so on the basis of measures well short of full lockdown.

Is the Prolockdown Data Good Enough to Justify Massive Human Rights Violations?

Extraordinary measures require extraordinary evidence. And the burden of proof is on those who seek to use the coercive power of the state to force people into their homes, cripple the economy, and abolish countless basic freedoms for the duration. Have the advocates for lockdowns made their case? It’s hard to see how they have. For one, advocates for lockdowns need to presentย obvious and overwhelmingย evidence that lockdowns bring big benefits far in excess of the no-lockdownย approach.ย They have not done so. Moreover, they have not shown that a lack of lockdowns is anywhere near as dangerous as they have claimed in the name of pushing lockdowns to begin with. We can already see what the no-lockdown scenarioย looks like. It looks like Sweden, and that’s a better outcome than many prolockdown regimes can claim. Governments are nonetheless likely to continue claiming their lockdowns worked. In ancient days, a witch doctor might perform a rain dance on Tuesdayย and claim credit when it rained on Wednesday. Lockdowns are increasingly looking like the modern equivalent of a rain dance.

Reprinted with permission fromย Mises.org.

Source: The Evidence Keeps Piling up: Lockdowns Donโ€™t Work

NEP #51 Dr Northrup and Prof Cahill on the Frontline of Medical Tyranny – New Earth Project – Sacha Stone

 

DIVIDED WE FALL, AND GOOD VS. EVIL – Mark Devlin

Thoughts on last weekendโ€™s London protest event, the disappointing fall-out from it, and a reminder that Evil does not have the monopoly on our shared experiences.

Details of the COVID-19 UK Truth Tour here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/22785…