Monthly Archives: June 2021

by

Dispatches from the War: the pharmaceutical/medical troops occupy planet Earth Jun 23 by Jon Rappoport | NoMoreFakeNews.com

How many drug scripts do doctors write per year?

by Jon Rappoport

June 23, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

I wrote the following piece in 2017. It details the massively successful infiltration of pharmaceutical armies among the population.

These men and women are war criminals.

Here we go:

Medical News Today reports that, in 2011, there was a modest uptick in the number of drug prescriptions written in the US.

The increase brought the total to: 4.02 billion.

Yes, in 2011, doctors wrote 4.02 billion prescriptions for drugs in America.

That’s an average of roughly 13 prescriptions for each man, woman, and child.

That’s about one new prescription every month for every American. (Update: the Kaiser Family Foundation reports that in 2016, 4,065,479,343 drug prescriptions were written by US doctors—an increase of 65 million.)

The Medical News Today article concluded, “…the industry should be heartened by the growth of the number of prescriptions and spending.” Yes, I’m sure the drug industry popped champagne corks.

We’re talking about prescriptions here. We’re not talking about the number of pills Americans took. We’re also not counting over-the-counter drugs or vaccine shots.

Pharmacopoeia, a 2011 exhibition at the British Museum, estimated that “the average number of pills a person takes in his or her own lifetime in the UK is 14,000.” That’s as a result of prescriptions. Including over-the-counter drugs, the 14,000 number would swell to 40,000 pills taken in a lifetime.

What are the effects of all these drugs?

We are looking at a supreme Trojan Horse that is rotting out America and all other countries from the inside. Wars, no wars, economic deprivation, economic prosperity, the drugs continue to do their work, debilitating and ruining and terminating lives.

Many sources can be cited to confirm this assessment.

On January 8th, 2001, the LA Times published an article by one of the best medical reporters in the business, Linda Marsa: “When Good Drugs Do Harm.” Marsa quoted researcher Dr. David Bates, who indicated that, in the US, there are 36 million serious adverse reactions to medical drugs per year.

On July 26, 2000, the Journal of the American Medical Association published the most stunning mainstream estimate of medical-drug damage in history: “Is US health really the best in the world?” The author was Dr. Barbara Starfield, a respected public-health researcher at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.

Starfield concluded that medical drugs were killing Americans at the rate of 106,000 per year.

That’s a million deaths per decade.

This is a conservative sketch of the Trojan Horse that has been placed in the center of every country in the world.

The pharmaceutical juggernaut will continue, no doubt about it. The only question is, how many people will wake up and seek another way?

The destruction of societies by medical drugs goes far beyond what some people call “over-prescribing.” This isn’t just a tilt in the wrong direction. It isn’t simply errors of judgment compounded by the number of doctors dispensing medicines.

Those are all polite terms suggesting the situation can be corrected through a show of better professional judgment. That will never happen.

Countries of the world are literally being assaulted by pharmaceutical companies and their foot-soldier doctors. It’s chemical warfare.

To even begin to see light at the end of the tunnel, hundreds of millions of people must add themselves to the rolls of those who already are pursuing better health through natural means.

Not even the Nazis and their dearly beloved cartel, the monster IG Farben, dreamed of the day when the citizenry would line up and demand to ingest more and more life-destroying chemicals.

What about the FDA, the federal agency responsible for certifying all medical drugs “safe and effective,” before release for public use in the US?

The FDA is completely aware of the monstrous death toll and the injuries stemming from the very drugs they’re approving—but they take zero responsibility.

On an FDA website page, “Preventable Adverse Drug Reactions: A Focus on Drug Interactions,” the agency discusses the “problem”—but as you can see from the title, they’re framing the conversation in terms of “interactions,” as if drugs are maiming and killing people because they are accidentally combining effects. This is a gross lie. Continued … 

Dispatches from the War: the pharmaceutical/medical troops occupy planet Earth

 

by

Mel K and Benjamin Fulford Unlock Truth

If you’re a fan of conspiracies, you’re going to love this show, where Mel K interviews Japan-based Canadian journalist, Benjamin Fulford. Fulford says it has been forensically proven – that he could prove it in a court of law – that there is a group of about a million people who he calls the “Khazarian Mafia” who are also known as the “Sabbatean Frankists”. He says this group came to the conclusion that it was … continued: 

Source: Mel K and Benjamin Fulford Unlock Truth

by

Why Aren’t The Government And Media Investigating The Frightening Science On 5G? | Esther Moncrief, MSW | The Real Truth About Health

Why Aren’t The Government And Media Investigating The Frightening Science On 5G? with Daniel Debaun, Brian Clement Ph.D., Gabriel Cousens, M.D., Theodora Scarato,
Connect with The Real Truth About Health: http://www.therealtruthabouthealth.com/
https://www.facebook.com/The-Real-Tru… https://www.instagram.com/therealtrut…
https://twitter.com/RTAHealth
https://www.youtube.com/c/TheRealTrut…
Passionate believers in whole food plant based diets, no chemicals, minimal pharmaceutical drugs, no GMO’s. Fighting to stop climate change and extinction. Please support the sponsors of our conference http://www.therealtruthabouthealthcon…“
by

MAGNET MEAT?! Many Cases Popping Up Of Magnets Sticking To Package Meat. Contaminated Food Supply?!

Join our leading researchers on https://GroupDiscover.com to find the best videos from across the censorship-resistant internet platforms like Odysee, LBRY, Bitchute & Brighteon

Add me on these great platforms:

https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/

https://bitchute.com/timtruth/

https://GroupDiscover.com and

https://flote.app/timtruth1 Brought to you by the great supporters of this channel who fund this research. Join us on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/timtruth for exclusive content, censored videos and to help me make this channel even better.

Source: MAGNET MEAT?! Many Cases Popping Up Of Magnets Sticking To Package Meat. Contaminated Food Supply?!

by

Pharmacist Quits Job and Spill the Beans – CVS Pharmacy Pays $6,500/Week for Giving Vaccines

She couldn’t wait for the first load of vaccines to arrive at their store so she could read the scientific recipe data sheet that always accompanied vaccines.

The covid “vaccine” information had only one thing printed 3 times:
“Left intentionally blank”

There’s MUCH more!

Download the video:
https://dlsharefile.com/file/OGI4OTdlZjkt

Source: Pharmacist Quits Job and Spill the Beans – CVS Pharmacy Pays $6,500/Week for Giving Vaccines

by

Fear Is Contagious and Used To Control You – by Dr. Joseph Mercola | Mercola.com | LewRockwell.com

Governments are using fear to control and manipulate their citizens. That has now been admitted by members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior (SPI-B), a subcommittee that advises the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) in the U.K. And they should know, because they advocated for it, and now say it was a regrettable mistake. As reported by The Telegraph, May 14, 2021:1 “Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people’s behavior during the COVID pandemic have admitted its work was ‘unethical’ and ‘totalitarian.’ Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior … Continue reading →

Source: Fear Is Contagious and Used To Control You – LewRockwell

by

Covid-19 vaccines: In the rush for regulatory approval, do we need more data? | Peter Doshi, senior editor | bmj.com

BMJ is a global healthcare knowledge provider with a vision for a healthier world. We share knowledge and expertise to improve healthcare outcomes.

BMJ 2021; 373 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1244 (Published 18 May 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;373:n1244

Read our latest coverage of the coronavirus pandemic

After rollout under emergency authorisation, manufacturers of covid-19 vaccines now have their sights on regulatory approval. But what’s the rush, asks Peter Doshi, and is just six months of data from now unblinded trials acceptable?

In April 2021, Pfizer and Moderna announced efficacy results at the six month mark from the phase III trials of their respective covid-19 vaccines.12

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said the company’s data “confirm the favorable efficacy and safety profile of our vaccine and position us to submit a Biologics License Application to the US FDA [Food and Drug Administration].”1 And on 7 May it formally initiated that application which, if successful, will earn the Pfizer-BioNTech product, BNT162b2, the distinction of becoming the first covid-19 vaccine approved by the FDA.

Because lest we forget, all covid-19 vaccines currently in use in the US are available under emergency access only.

(The situation is similar in Europe, where four covid-19 vaccines have been granted “conditional marketing authorisations,” a fast track mechanism that can be used in emergencies. These can be converted into standard “marketing authorisations” pending positive data after authorisation, but this has not yet happened for any covid-19 vaccine being administered.)

As hundreds of millions of people around the world get vaccinated, it may seem like wordsmithing to highlight the fact that none of the covid-19 vaccines in use are actually “approved.” Through an emergency access mechanism known as Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA), the products being rolled out still technically remain “investigational.”3 Factsheets distributed to vaccinees are clear: “There is no FDA approved vaccine to prevent covid-19.”4

The approval-authorisation distinction is often misunderstood by the media,5 even in the scientific press. But it was the focus of much discussion back in September 2020. With large phase III trials by Pfizer and Moderna well under way, and the November US presidential election looming, many worried about political pressure resulting in the rollout of an unsafe or ineffective vaccine.6

The FDA had already come under fire, accused of bending to the White House in granting EUAs for two covid-19 treatments, hydroxychloroquine and convalescent plasma. But those fears largely dissipated when the FDA published a guidance document in early October outlining its expectations for the EUA. According to the document, at least half of a trial’s participants would need to be followed for at least two months.7 This alone made it all but certain no vaccine could cross the line before the election.

The FDA also said it would want a vaccine at least 50% effective (with a confidence interval reaching no lower than 30%) against a primary endpoint of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or covid-19 disease of any severity8—parameters it had previously defined as necessary for approval. Even for non-clinical parameters, like manufacturing quality, the FDA characterised its expectations for the EUA as “very similar” to those for approval.3

Six months: enough?

One key difference between EUA and approval (also called “licensure,” and which for vaccines is known as a BLA (Biologics License Application)) was the expected length of follow-up of trial participants. Unlike its clear articulation of two months for an EUA, the FDA has not committed to a clear minimum for approval.

Cody Meissner, a professor of paediatrics at Tufts University and member of the FDA’s advisory committee, was curious. “Is it possible to predict or estimate when conditions of safety and efficacy might be satisfied for BLA?” Meissner asked at the agency’s 10 December meeting which had been convened to consider the FDA’s first emergency authorisation for the Pfizer vaccine.

The FDA’s Doran Fink responded: “I couldn’t predict, but I will say that we typically ask for at least six months of follow-up in a substantial number of clinical trial participants to constitute a safety database that would support licensure.”

An approval based on six months of data would represent one of the fastest for a novel vaccine in FDA history. Among the six “first in disease” vaccines approved by the FDA since 2006, pre-licensure pivotal trials were a median of 23 months in duration, according to a recent analysis.9

Six months also seems substantially shorter than previously conceptualised expectations. A World Health Organization expert group on covid-19 vaccines (which included FDA regulators) in August 2020 called for follow-up “until at least month 12, or until an effective vaccine is deployed locally.”10 Another group, composed of industry and academic authors, similarly wrote in October 2020: “we recommend longer term follow-up of all participants … for at least a year after randomisation.”11

On paper, the phase III studies by Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen are all of two years’ duration. But the FDA’s official position on minimum follow-up before licensure is unclear at best.

In its formal guidance last June, the agency said that for licensure applications, it wanted participants followed for covid-19 outcomes for “as long as feasible, ideally at least one to two years”12 after the first injection. But the same document states that safety assessments for “serious and other medically attended adverse events” should be studied “for at least six months after completion of all study vaccinations. Longer safety monitoring may be warranted for certain vaccine platforms.”

Asked to clarify whether its guidance is asking for follow-up of at least six months or one year, a spokesperson told The BMJ: “We do not have any further information beyond what is in the guidance document.”

Unblinded and without a control group—what about safety?

Duration of protection is not the only question that longer, placebo controlled trials can address. They also address vaccine safety.

Continued at Source:

https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1244

by

Sandy Glaze Discusses Inner Peace, Work and Consciousness with Nicholas Veniamin

📮 GET My FREE Email Updates: https://NicholasVeniamin.com

🎙 JOIN My Group on My Patriots Network: https://bit.ly/3dZ5WoQ
📡 Watch 5G Radiation Alert: https://bit.ly/32gcbPF
📱 JOIN My TELEGRAM Channel: https://t.me/NicholasVeniamin
🥒 Wellness: https://nicholasveniamin.com/wellness/

Source: Sandy Glaze Discusses Inner Peace, Work and Consciousness with Nicholas Veniamin

by

You Have More Power Than You Think | David Icke

You Have More Power Than You Think | David Icke # DavidIcke # DavidIckevideos #motivation 🔈 SPEAKER: David Icke More Here – ►►The Most Important Question | Alan Watts https://youtu.be/2pteZfbssgA ►►David Icke | We Are All In Trouble https://youtu.be/VMt7D1DQufQ ►►Most People See It Once It’s Too Late | Alan Watts on Individuality https://youtu.be/e9-9xlle8Q4 ►►David Icke | The Truth That Most People Refuse To See.. https://youtu.be/7MHfK6n2KFE ►►If You Use Social Media YOU D BETTER SEE THIS! | Jordan Peterson https://youtu.be/B-UB9dVq7gw ►►We Are Being Set Up! https://youtu.be/TmnArTkOoSU ►►These Events Will Change Everything https://youtu.be/0yMfqgGDghE Topics Are – meditation becoming supernatural, pineal gland meditation, breathing technique, sleep meditation, heal your body with your mind, walking meditation, blessing of the energy centres,